scholarly journals The k-metric dimension of the lexicographic product of graphs

2016 ◽  
Vol 339 (7) ◽  
pp. 1924-1934 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alejandro Estrada-Moreno ◽  
Ismael G. Yero ◽  
Juan A. Rodríguez-Velázquez
2013 ◽  
Vol 313 (9) ◽  
pp. 1045-1051 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.W. Saputro ◽  
R. Simanjuntak ◽  
S. Uttunggadewa ◽  
H. Assiyatun ◽  
E.T. Baskoro ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 2367-2392 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Estrada-Moreno ◽  
I. G. Yero ◽  
J. A. Rodríguez-Velázquez

2012 ◽  
Vol 312 (22) ◽  
pp. 3349-3356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohsen Jannesari ◽  
Behnaz Omoomi

2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 2481-2496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel A. Barragán-Ramírez ◽  
Alejandro Estrada-Moreno ◽  
Yunior Ramírez-Cruz ◽  
Juan A. Rodríguez-Velázquez

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 72
Author(s):  
H Hendy ◽  
Kiki A. Sugeng ◽  
A.N.M Salman ◽  
Nisa Ayunda

<p>Let <span class="math"><em>H</em></span> and <span class="math"><em>G</em></span> be two simple graphs. The concept of an <span class="math"><em>H</em></span>-magic decomposition of <span class="math"><em>G</em></span> arises from the combination between graph decomposition and graph labeling. A decomposition of a graph <span class="math"><em>G</em></span> into isomorphic copies of a graph <span class="math"><em>H</em></span> is <span class="math"><em>H</em></span>-magic if there is a bijection <span class="math"><em>f</em> : <em>V</em>(<em>G</em>) ∪ <em>E</em>(<em>G</em>) → {1, 2, ..., ∣<em>V</em>(<em>G</em>) ∪ <em>E</em>(<em>G</em>)∣}</span> such that the sum of labels of edges and vertices of each copy of <span class="math"><em>H</em></span> in the decomposition is constant. A lexicographic product of two graphs <span class="math"><em>G</em><sub>1</sub></span> and <span class="math"><em>G</em><sub>2</sub>, </span> denoted by <span class="math"><em>G</em><sub>1</sub>[<em>G</em><sub>2</sub>], </span> is a graph which arises from <span class="math"><em>G</em><sub>1</sub></span> by replacing each vertex of <span class="math"><em>G</em><sub>1</sub></span> by a copy of the <span class="math"><em>G</em><sub>2</sub></span> and each edge of <span class="math"><em>G</em><sub>1</sub></span> by all edges of the complete bipartite graph <span class="math"><em>K</em><sub><em>n</em>, <em>n</em></sub></span> where <span class="math"><em>n</em></span> is the order of <span class="math"><em>G</em><sub>2</sub>.</span> In this paper we provide a sufficient condition for <span class="math">$\overline{C_{n}}[\overline{K_{m}}]$</span> in order to have a <span class="math">$P_{t}[\overline{K_{m}}]$</span>-magic decompositions, where <span class="math"><em>n</em> &gt; 3, <em>m</em> &gt; 1, </span> and <span class="math"><em>t</em> = 3, 4, <em>n</em> − 2</span>.</p>


2014 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 1521-1533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjier H. Arriola ◽  
Sergio R. Canoy, Jr.

2015 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. 139-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cláudia Linhares Sales ◽  
Rafael Vargas ◽  
Leonardo Sampaio

2011 ◽  
Vol 311 (16) ◽  
pp. 1693-1698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boštjan Brešar ◽  
Tadeja Kraner Šumenjak ◽  
Aleksandra Tepeh

10.37236/2974 ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Feng ◽  
Min Xu ◽  
Kaishun Wang

Let $G$ be a connected graph and $H$ be an arbitrary graph. In this paper, we study the identifying codes of the lexicographic product $G[H]$ of $G$ and $H$. We first introduce two parameters of $H$, which are closely related to identifying codes of $H$. Then we provide the sufficient and necessary condition for $G[H]$ to be identifiable. Finally, if $G[H]$ is identifiable, we determine the minimum cardinality of identifying codes of $G[H]$ in terms of the order of $G$ and these two parameters of $H$.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document