Strong equality of Roman and perfect Roman domination in trees

A Roman dominating function (RD-function) on a graph $G = (V, E)$ is a function $f: V \longrightarrow \{0, 1, 2\}$ satisfying the condition that every vertex $u$ for which $f(u) = 0$ is adjacent to at least one vertex $v$ for which $f(v) = 2$. An Roman dominating function $f$ in a graph $G$ is perfect Roman dominating function (PRD-function) if every vertex $u$ with $f(u) = 0$ is adjacent to exactly one vertex $v$ for which $f(v) = 2$. The (perfect) Roman domination number $\gamma_R(G)$ ($\gamma_{R}^{p}(G)$) is the minimum weight of an (perfect) Roman dominating function on $G$. We say that $\gamma_{R}^{p}(G)$ strongly equals $\gamma_R(G)$, denoted by $\gamma_{R}^{p}(G)\equiv \gamma_R(G)$, if every RD-function on $G$ of minimum weight is a PRD-function. In this paper we show that for a given graph $G$, it is NP-hard to decide whether $\gamma_{R}^{p}(G)= \gamma_R(G)$ and also we provide a constructive characterization of trees $T$ with $\gamma_{R}^{p}(T)\equiv \gamma_R(T)$.

On the double Roman bondage numbers of graphs

For a graph [Formula: see text], a double Roman dominating function (DRDF) is a function [Formula: see text] having the property that if [Formula: see text] for some vertex [Formula: see text], then [Formula: see text] has at least two neighbors assigned [Formula: see text] under [Formula: see text] or one neighbor [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text], and if [Formula: see text] then [Formula: see text] has at least one neighbor [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text]. The weight of a DRDF [Formula: see text] is the sum [Formula: see text]. The minimum weight of a DRDF on a graph [Formula: see text] is the double Roman domination number of [Formula: see text] and is denoted by [Formula: see text]. The double Roman bondage number of [Formula: see text], denoted by [Formula: see text], is the minimum cardinality among all edge subsets [Formula: see text] such that [Formula: see text]. In this paper, we study the double Roman bondage number in graphs. We determine the double Roman bondage number in several families of graphs, and present several bounds for the double Roman bondage number. We also study the complexity issue of the double Roman bondage number and prove that the decision problem for the double Roman bondage number is NP-hard even when restricted to bipartite graphs.

New Bounds on the Triple Roman Domination Number of Graphs

In this paper, we derive sharp upper and lower bounds on the sum γ 3 R G + γ 3 R G ¯ and product γ 3 R G γ 3 R G ¯ , where G ¯ is the complement of graph G . We also show that for each tree T of order n ≥ 2 , γ 3 R T ≤ 3 n + s T / 2 and γ 3 R T ≥ ⌈ 4 n T + 2 − ℓ T / 3 ⌉ , where s T and ℓ T are the number of support vertices and leaves of T .

On the Double Roman Domination in Generalized Petersen Graphs P(5k,k)

A double Roman dominating function on a graph G=(V,E) is a function f:V→{0,1,2,3} satisfying the condition that every vertex u for which f(u)=0 is adjacent to at least one vertex assigned 3 or at least two vertices assigned 2, and every vertex u with f(u)=1 is adjacent to at least one vertex assigned 2 or 3. The weight of f equals w(f)=∑v∈Vf(v). The double Roman domination number γdR(G) of a graph G equals the minimum weight of a double Roman dominating function of G. We obtain closed expressions for the double Roman domination number of generalized Petersen graphs P(5k,k). It is proven that γdR(P(5k,k))=8k for k≡2,3mod5 and 8k≤γdR(P(5k,k))≤8k+2 for k≡0,1,4mod5. We also improve the upper bounds for generalized Petersen graphs P(20k,k).