Freshwater spring indicator taxa of benthic invertebrates

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 622-631 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ye Sun ◽  
Yasuhiro Takemon ◽  
Yosuke Yamashiki
Author(s):  
Allison L. K. Banting ◽  
Mark K. Taylor ◽  
Rolf D. Vinebrooke ◽  
Chris M. Carli ◽  
Mark S. Poesch

Author(s):  
Antoine Morin ◽  
Jaynie Stephenson ◽  
Jessica Strike ◽  
Angelo G. Solimini

Ecology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 250-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin B. A. Macfarlane ◽  
David Drolet ◽  
Myriam A. Barbeau ◽  
Diana J. Hamilton ◽  
Jeff Ollerhead

1995 ◽  
Vol 52 (7) ◽  
pp. 1406-1420 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. Reid ◽  
K. M. Somers ◽  
S. M. David

Surveys of benthic invertebrates have revealed patterns attributed to the impacts of acid deposition. Unfortunately, these patterns may be confounded by temporal variation that will affect follow-up studies of the recovery of these communities. Here, we assess spatial and temporal variation in time-limited, kick-and-sweep collections of littoral-zone benthos. Spatial variation comprised five sites representing the predominant nearshore substrates in each of three lakes. Temporal variation spanned a different scale in each lake with five sites sampled: (i) twice on the same day, (ii) once a week for 3 weeks, and (iii) four times through the ice-free season. Variation was quantified using a model II analysis of variance. Spatial differences predominated in same-day samples (60.4% of the variation on average) and those collected over a 3-week period (46.1%). In contrast, samples collected over the ice-free season revealed that spatial and temporal factors accounted for 9.4 and 25.6% of the variation. We conclude that our collections of littoral macrobenthos are highly repeatable if sampling is restricted to short periods (e.g., 3 weeks). Surveys spanning longer periods may incorporate considerable temporal variation from seasonal changes in abundance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document