scholarly journals Ecosystem services—science, policy and practice: Introduction to the journal and the inaugural issue

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leon C. Braat
One Ecosystem ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. e24720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joachim Maes ◽  
Benjamin Burkhard ◽  
Davide Geneletti

A recent policy forum article in Science by Díaz et al. (2018) introduces nature's contributions to people (NCP) as an innovative approach to inform policy and decision-making. According to the authors, the NCP concept extends beyond the notion of ecosystem services by incorporating a more inclusive and interdisciplinary approach. Here this claim is challenged. Based on our experiences in Europe, we argue that the science, policy and practice of ecosystem services have progressed much beyond a mere economic and ecological rationale.


2014 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. 161-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rob Alkemade ◽  
Benjamin Burkhard ◽  
Neville D. Crossman ◽  
Stoyan Nedkov ◽  
Katalin Petz

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 599-607 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Pérez-Soba ◽  
Peter Verweij ◽  
Heli Saarikoski ◽  
Paula A. Harrison ◽  
David N. Barton ◽  
...  

Science ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 331 (6021) ◽  
pp. 1139-1140 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Perrings ◽  
A. Duraiappah ◽  
A. Larigauderie ◽  
H. Mooney

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Burkhard ◽  
Neville Crossman ◽  
Stoyan Nedkov ◽  
Katalin Petz ◽  
Rob Alkemade

Author(s):  
JB Ruhl ◽  
James Salzman ◽  
Craig Anthony Arnold ◽  
Robin Craig ◽  
Keith Hirokawa ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Gabriel Lopez Porras

Despite international efforts to stop dryland degradation and expansion, current dryland pathways are predicted to result in large-scale migration, growing poverty and famine, and increasing climate change, land degradation, conflicts and water scarcity. Earth system science has played a key role in analysing dryland problems, and has been even incorporated in global assessments such as the ones made by the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. However, policies addressing dryland degradation, like the ‘Mexican programme for the promotion of sustainable land management’, do not embrace an Earth system perspective, so they do not consider the complexity and non-linearity that underlie dryland problems. By exploring how this Mexican programme could integrate the Earth system perspective, this paper discusses how ’Earth system’ policies could better address dryland degradation and expansion in the Anthropocene.


2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (24) ◽  
pp. 7362-7368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Belinda Reyers ◽  
Jeanne L. Nel ◽  
Patrick J. O’Farrell ◽  
Nadia Sitas ◽  
Deon C. Nel

Achieving the policy and practice shifts needed to secure ecosystem services is hampered by the inherent complexities of ecosystem services and their management. Methods for the participatory production and exchange of knowledge offer an avenue to navigate this complexity together with the beneficiaries and managers of ecosystem services. We develop and apply a knowledge coproduction approach based on social–ecological systems research and assess its utility in generating shared knowledge and action for ecosystem services. The approach was piloted in South Africa across four case studies aimed at reducing the risk of disasters associated with floods, wildfires, storm waves, and droughts. Different configurations of stakeholders (knowledge brokers, assessment teams, implementers, and bridging agents) were involved in collaboratively designing each study, generating and exchanging knowledge, and planning for implementation. The approach proved useful in the development of shared knowledge on the sizable contribution of ecosystem services to disaster risk reduction. This knowledge was used by stakeholders to design and implement several actions to enhance ecosystem services, including new investments in ecosystem restoration, institutional changes in the private and public sector, and innovative partnerships of science, practice, and policy. By bringing together multiple disciplines, sectors, and stakeholders to jointly produce the knowledge needed to understand and manage a complex system, knowledge coproduction approaches offer an effective avenue for the improved integration of ecosystem services into decision making.


2014 ◽  
Vol 369 (1639) ◽  
pp. 20120286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ferdinando Villa ◽  
Brian Voigt ◽  
Jon D. Erickson

As societal demand for food, water and other life-sustaining resources grows, the science of ecosystem services (ES) is seen as a promising tool to improve our understanding, and ultimately the management, of increasingly uncertain supplies of critical goods provided or supported by natural ecosystems. This promise, however, is tempered by a relatively primitive understanding of the complex systems supporting ES, which as a result are often quantified as static resources rather than as the dynamic expression of human–natural systems. This article attempts to pinpoint the minimum level of detail that ES science needs to achieve in order to usefully inform the debate on environmental securities, and discusses both the state of the art and recent methodological developments in ES in this light. We briefly review the field of ES accounting methods and list some desiderata that we deem necessary, reachable and relevant to address environmental securities through an improved science of ES. We then discuss a methodological innovation that, while only addressing these needs partially, can improve our understanding of ES dynamics in data-scarce situations. The methodology is illustrated and discussed through an application related to water security in the semi-arid landscape of the Great Ruaha river of Tanzania.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document