scholarly journals Maternal and neonatal outcomes according to gestational weight gain in twin pregnancies: Are the Institute of Medicine guidelines associated with better outcomes?

Author(s):  
Océane Pécheux ◽  
Charles Garabedian ◽  
Elodie Drumez ◽  
Sarah Mizrahi ◽  
Sophie Cordiez ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (13) ◽  
pp. 2182-2185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate E. Pettit ◽  
Daphne Y. Lacoursiere ◽  
David B. Schrimmer ◽  
Hedaya Alblewi ◽  
Thomas R. Moore ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey A. Gavard ◽  
Raul Artal

Limited data is available that estimates the effect of gestational weight gain on maternal and neonatal outcomes in term twin pregnancies in obese women. A historical cohort study of 831 obese (BMI ≥30.0 kg/m2) women in Missouri delivering 1,662 liveborn, term (≥37 weeks gestation) twin infants in 1998–2005 was conducted. Three gestational weight gain categories were examined: <25 pounds, 25–42 pounds, and >42 pounds. Adjusted odds ratios were calculated with multiple logistic regression, using the 2009 Institute of Medicine provisional guideline of 25–42 pounds as the reference group. Significant increasing trends with gestational weight gain were found for preeclampsia (p < .05), larger twin birth weight (p < .01), smaller twin birth weight (p < .001), and infants weighing >2,500 grams (p < .001). Significant increasing trends for preeclampsia and for cesarean delivery were found in concordant twin pairs (smaller twin >80% of birth weight of larger twin). Women who gained >42 pounds had a borderline significantly higher odds of preeclampsia than women who gained 25–42 pounds (adjusted OR 1.72; 95% CI 1.00–2.99, p = .052). No significant differences were found for 1-min Apgar score <4, 5-min Apgar score <7, or infant mortality ≤1 year. Our study suggests that increasing gestational weight gain is associated with larger infants but increased risk of preeclampsia and cesarean delivery in term twin pregnancies in obese women. Limiting gestational weight gain could reduce the risk of preeclampsia and cesarean delivery. Prospective studies of other study populations and maternal/infant outcomes are needed to evaluate the efficacy of the Institute of Medicine guideline.


Author(s):  
Reyna Sámano ◽  
Hugo Martínez-Rojano ◽  
Gabriela Chico-Barba ◽  
Bernarda Sánchez-Jiménez ◽  
Daniel Illescas-Zarate ◽  
...  

It has been proposed that, in the Mexican culture, family support can be a factor that contributes to protect the maternal and child health of pregnant adolescents. There may be complex associations between family support and the circumstances of a pregnancy during adolescence. The aim of the study was to analyze the association between the family support network (FSN) characteristic and the maternal and neonatal outcomes in Mexican adolescents. A cross-sectional study was conducted, and 352 pregnant adolescents participated; their FSN during pregnancy was assessed. The gestational weight gain and birth weight/length of newborns were registered. The size of the FSN was described and divided into quartiles; the main members for each quartile were identified. Then, sociodemographic and clinical variables were compared by FSN quartiles. Logistic regression models were performed to assess the association of FSN size and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. Our results indicate that the mean age was 15 ± 1 year old. The primary support member in the FSN was the mother of the adolescent in each quartile, except for quartile 3, where the primary support was the mother-in-law. In quartile 3 there was a significantly lower gestational weight gain compared to quartile 4 (11.8 ± 5 vs. 13 ± 5 kg, p = 0.054). According to the regression model, a higher risk of small for gestational age (OR 2.99, CI 95% 1.25–7.15) newborns was found in quartile 3. We conclude that the maternal and neonatal outcomes did not differ between quartiles of FSN size, except for quartile 3. Small for gestational age newborns were observed when a non-blood relative was present in the FSN. The quality rather than the network size might be more important for improving pregnancy outcomes.


2015 ◽  
Vol 212 (1) ◽  
pp. S340-S341
Author(s):  
Pardis Hosseinzadeh ◽  
Bahram Salmanian ◽  
Amirhossein Moaddab ◽  
Hossein Golabbakhsh ◽  
Alireza Shamshirsaz ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document