maternal and neonatal outcomes
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

1077
(FIVE YEARS 507)

H-INDEX

42
(FIVE YEARS 11)

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanxiang Sun ◽  
Yang Liu ◽  
Shijia Huang ◽  
Xiaosong Liu ◽  
Guohua Li ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo study the association between pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies after assisted reproductive technology (ART).MethodsThis hospital-based retrospective cohort study of women with live singleton births through ART in China from January 2015 to August 2020 included 3043 Chinese women. According to the latest BMI classification standard of Asian women, the women included in this study were classified as underweight (BMI <18.5 kg/m2), normal (BMI 18.5 to <23 kg/m2), overweight (BMI 23 to <27.5 kg/m2), and obese (BMI ≥27.5 kg/m2). We compared the risk of adverse outcomes of different pre-pregnancy BMI values of women with singleton pregnancies conceived through ART. We used Logistic regression analysis to estimate the associations between pre-pregnancy BMI and adverse perinatal and neonatal outcomes.ResultsOur findings showed that women who were overweight or obese before pregnancy through ART are more likely to have a cesarean section, gestational diabetes mellitus, gestational hypertension, and preeclampsia, regardless of whether confounding factors are adjusted. Moreover, pre-pregnancy obesity was more associated with a higher risk of these adverse outcomes than pre-pregnancy overweight. In addition, neonates from women who had obesity before pregnancy through ART were more likely to have macrosomia; adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were 3.004 (1.693-5.330).ConclusionsOur research showed that women who had pre-pregnancy overweight or obesity with singleton pregnancies through ART were more likely to have a cesarean section, gestational diabetes mellitus, gestational hypertension, and preeclampsia. Moreover, neonates from women who had obesity before pregnancy were more likely to have macrosomia.


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chongjuan Gu ◽  
Yaojuan He ◽  
Xiaojun Li ◽  
Qingfeng Li ◽  
Qingshan Xuan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Although first-trimester subchorionic hematoma (SCH) always concerns expectant parents, its clinical significance remains controversial. This study aimed to examine the relationship between first-trimester SCH and its association with subsequent miscarriage and other perinatal outcomes.Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including 43,660 women who underwent routine prenatal care since the first trimester and then were followed up for maternal and neonatal outcomes. SCH was detected in the first-trimester ultrasound examinations. Robust Poisson regression was used to estimate adjusted risk associations between SCH maternal and neonatal outcomes.Results: A total of 815 (1.87%) SCH were detected in the first-trimester ultrasound examination. The rate of miscarriage was statistically significantly higher in women with SCH than in those without [35.2% vs. 23.9%, P<0.01; adjusted relative risk (RR):1.44, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.31-1.58]. Subgroup analysis of women with SCH showed a clear trend that the earlier SCH occurred, the higher the risk of miscarriage was [adjusted RR and 95% CI for onset at the gestational weeks of 8-9, 6- 7, and <6 vs. ≥10: 1.30 (0.69-2.46), 2.33 (1.28-4.23), and 4.18 (2.30-7.58), respectively; Ptrend<0.01]. In addition, women with SCH volume ≥1ml showed higher risk than those <1 ml [adjusted RR and 95% CI for 1-4.9 ml, and ≥5 ml vs. <1 ml: 1.36 (1.10-1.68) and 1.56 (1.18-2.07), respectively]. There was no statistically significant difference in the rates of other pregnancy outcomes between women with and without SCH.Conclusions: First-trimester SCH might significantly increase the risk of miscarriage, particularly the one that occurs early and the one with large size. Data from this study do not suggest adverse effects of SCH on other maternal and neonatal outcomes.


2022 ◽  
Vol 226 (1) ◽  
pp. S369-S370
Author(s):  
Uma Doshi ◽  
Olivia Curl ◽  
Nonda S. Mester ◽  
Bharti Garg ◽  
Aaron B. Caughey

2022 ◽  
Vol 226 (1) ◽  
pp. S210-S211
Author(s):  
Ayamo Oben ◽  
Ernestina Boateng ◽  
Christina T. Blanchard ◽  
Brian M. Casey ◽  
Jeff M. Szychowski ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Vol 226 (1) ◽  
pp. S265
Author(s):  
Jillian Phillips ◽  
Uma Doshi ◽  
Bharti Garg ◽  
Aaron B. Caughey

2022 ◽  
Vol 226 (1) ◽  
pp. S217
Author(s):  
Erin L. MacLeod ◽  
Cynthia Cockerham ◽  
Katia V. Vela ◽  
Brittany M. McKinley ◽  
Zachary Stanley ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sarah E. Detlefs ◽  
Michael D. Jochum ◽  
Bahram Salmanian ◽  
Jennifer R McKinney ◽  
Kjersti M. Aagaard

2022 ◽  
Vol 226 (1) ◽  
pp. S389-S390
Author(s):  
Devin A. Macias ◽  
Rachel C. Schell ◽  
W. Holt Garner ◽  
Taibat Eribo ◽  
Donald D. McIntire ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Vol 226 (1) ◽  
pp. S268
Author(s):  
Olivia Curl ◽  
Uma Doshi ◽  
Nonda S. Mester ◽  
Bharti Garg ◽  
Aaron B. Caughey

2022 ◽  
Vol 226 (1) ◽  
pp. S433-S434
Author(s):  
Clara Bertozzi-Villa ◽  
Shai Bejerano ◽  
Cheng Chen ◽  
Jodi Lerner ◽  
Karin Fuchs ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document