Metal artifact reduction for small metal implants on CT: Which image reconstruction algorithm performs better?

2020 ◽  
Vol 127 ◽  
pp. 108970 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aurélie Grandmougin ◽  
Omar Bakour ◽  
Nicolas Villani ◽  
Cedric Baumann ◽  
Hélène Rousseau ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 38 (8) ◽  
pp. 797-802 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick T. Liu ◽  
William P. Pavlicek ◽  
Mary B. Peter ◽  
Mark J. Spangehl ◽  
Catherine C. Roberts ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 443-449
Author(s):  
Sujithraj Dommaraju ◽  
Masoud Nakhaei ◽  
Da Zhang ◽  
Andres Camacho ◽  
Johannes Boos ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 72 (724) ◽  
pp. 1888-1894
Author(s):  
Michihiko KOSEKI ◽  
Shuhei HASHIMOTO ◽  
Shinpei SATO ◽  
Hitoshi KIMURA ◽  
Norio INOU

2018 ◽  
Vol 226 ◽  
pp. 04048
Author(s):  
Nikolay V. Gapon ◽  
Evgenii A. Semenishchev ◽  
Oxana S. Balabaeva ◽  
Arina A. Skorikova ◽  
Olga A. Tokareva ◽  
...  

This article examines the method of image reconstruction, which aims to restore the exposed areas on MRI images. The algorithm is based on a geometric model for patch synthesis. The lost pixels are recovered by copying pixel values from the source using a similarity criterion. We used a trained neural network to choose the “best similar” patch. Experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms widely used state-of-the-art methods.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document