metal artifact
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

747
(FIVE YEARS 236)

H-INDEX

41
(FIVE YEARS 6)

Author(s):  
Gengsheng L. Zeng

AbstractMetal objects in X-ray computed tomography can cause severe artifacts. The state-of-the-art metal artifact reduction methods are in the sinogram inpainting category and are iterative methods. This paper proposes a projection-domain algorithm to reduce the metal artifacts. In this algorithm, the unknowns are the metal-affected projections, while the objective function is set up in the image domain. The data fidelity term is not utilized in the objective function. The objective function of the proposed algorithm consists of two terms: the total variation of the metal-removed image and the energy of the negative-valued pixels in the image. After the metal-affected projections are modified, the final image is reconstructed via the filtered backprojection algorithm. The feasibility of the proposed algorithm has been verified by real experimental data.


2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yakdiel Rodriguez-Gallo ◽  
Ruben Orozco-Morales ◽  
Marlen Perez-Diaz

Abstract Image quality (IQ) assessment plays an important role in the medical world. New methods to evaluate image quality have been developed, but their application in the context of computer tomography is yet limited. In this paper the performance of fifteen well-known full reference (FR) IQ metrics is compared with human judgment using images affected by metal artifacts and processed with metal artifact reduction methods from a phantom. Five region of interest with different sizes were selected. IQ was evaluated by seven experienced radiologists completely blinded to the information. To measure the correlation between FR-IQ, and the score assigned by radiologists non-parametric Spearman rank-order correlation coefficient and Kendall’s Rank-order Correlation coefficient were used; so as root mean square error and the mean absolute error to measure the prediction accuracy. Cohen’s kappa was employed with the purpose of assessing inter-observer agreement. The metrics GMSD, IWMSE, IWPSNR, WSNR and OSS-PSNR were the best ranked. Inter-observer agreement was between 0.596 and 0.954, with p<0.001 in all study. The objective scores predicted by these methods correlate consistently with the subjective evaluations. The application of this metrics will make possible a better evaluation of metal artifact reduction algorithms in future works.


BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fang-ling Zhang ◽  
Ruo-cheng Li ◽  
Xiao-ling Zhang ◽  
Zhao-hui Zhang ◽  
Ling Ma ◽  
...  

Abstract Background To evaluate the effect of the single energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR) algorithm with a multidetector CT (MDCT) for knee tumor prostheses. Methods First, a phantom of knee tumor prosthesis underwent a MDCT scan. The raw data was reconstructed by iterative reconstruction (IR) alone and IR plus SEMAR. The mean value of the CT number and the image noise were measured around the prosthesis at the stem level and articular level. Second, 95 consecutive patients with knee tumor prostheses underwent MDCT scans. The raw data were also reconstructed by the two methods. Periprosthetic structures were selected at the similar two levels. Four radiologists visually graded the image quality on a scale from 0 to 5. Additionally, the readers also assessed the presence of prosthetic complication and tumor recurrence on a same scale. Results In the phantom, when the SEMAR was used, the CT numbers were closer to normal value and the noise of images using soft and sharper kernel were respectively reduced by up to 77.1% and 43.4% at the stem level, and by up to 82.2% and 64.5% at the articular level. The subjective scores increased 1 ~ 3 points and 1 ~ 4 points at the two levels, respectively. Prosthetic complications and tumor recurrence were diagnosed in 66 patients. And the SEMAR increased the diagnostic confidence of prosthetic complications and tumor recurrence (4 ~ 5 vs. 1 ~ 1.5). Conclusions The SEMAR algorithm can significantly reduce the metal artifacts and increase diagnostic confidence of prosthetic complications and tumor recurrence in patients with knee tumor prostheses.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Selles ◽  
Vera H. Stuivenberg ◽  
Ruud H. H. Wellenberg ◽  
Loes van de Riet ◽  
Ingrid M. Nijholt ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective To quantify metal artifact reduction using 130 keV virtual monochromatic imaging (VMI) with and without orthopedic metal artifact reduction (O-MAR) in total hip arthroplasty. Methods Conventional polychromatic images and 130 keV VMI of a phantom with pellets representing bone with unilateral or bilateral prostheses were reconstructed with and without O-MAR on a dual-layer CT. Pellets were categorized as unaffected, mildly affected and severely affected. Results When 130 keV VMI with O-MAR was compared to conventional imaging with O-MAR, a relative metal artifact reduction in CT values, contrast-to-noise (CNR), signal-to-noise (SNR) and noise in mildly affected pellets (67%, 74%, 48%, 68%, respectively; p < 0.05) was observed but no significant relative metal artifact reduction in severely affected pellets. Comparison between 130 keV VMI without O-MAR and conventional imaging with O-MAR showed relative metal artifact reduction in CT values, CNR, SNR and noise in mildly affected pellets (92%, 72%, 38%, 51%, respectively; p < 0.05) but negative relative metal artifact reduction in CT values and noise in severely affected pellets (− 331% and -223%, respectively; p < 0.05), indicating aggravation of metal artifacts. Conclusion Overall, VMI of 130 keV with O-MAR provided the strongest metal artifact reduction.


Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 2154
Author(s):  
Daniel Troeltzsch ◽  
Seyd Shnayien ◽  
Max Heiland ◽  
Kilian Kreutzer ◽  
Jan-Dirk Raguse ◽  
...  

State-of-the-art technology in Computed Tomography (CT) includes iterative reconstruction algorithms (IR) and metal artefact reduction (MAR) techniques. The objective of the study is to show the benefits of this technology for the detection of primary and recurrent head and neck cancer. A total of 131 patients underwent contrast-enhanced CT for diagnosis of primary and recurrent Head and Neck cancer; 110 patients were included. All scans were reconstructed using iterative reconstruction, and metal artifact reduction was applied when indicated. Tumor detectability was evaluated dichotomously. Histopathological findings were used as a standard of reference. Data were analyzed retrospectively, statistics was performed through diagnostic test characteristics. State-of-the-art Head and Neck CT showed a sensitivity of 0.83 (95% CI; 0.61–0.95) with 0.93 specificity (95% CI; 0.84–0.98) for primary tumor detection. Recurrent tumors were identified with a 0.94 sensitivity (95% CI; 0.71–0.99) and 0.93 specificity (95% CI; 0.84–0.98) in this study. Conclusion: State-of-the-art reconstruction tools improve the diagnostic quality of Head and Neck CT, especially for recurrent tumor detection, compared with data published for standard CT. IR and MAR are easily implemented in routine clinical settings and improve image evaluation by reducing artifacts and image noise while lowering radiation exposure.


Author(s):  
Fanning Kong ◽  
Ming Cheng ◽  
Ning Wang ◽  
Huaisheng Cao ◽  
Zaifeng Shi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document