150. Minimally invasive inguinal lymph node dissection: Case presentation from Egypt

2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (9) ◽  
pp. S118
Author(s):  
H. Abdel Mageed Abdel Motaal
2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. e153
Author(s):  
Hisham Abdel Mageed A. Motaal ◽  
Ihab Saad ◽  
Ahmed Mostafa ◽  
Tarek Elbaradie ◽  
Mohamed Safa ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 340-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea M. Abbott ◽  
Travis E. Grotz ◽  
Natasha M. Rueth ◽  
Roberto C. Hernandez Irizarry ◽  
Todd M. Tuttle ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 2501
Author(s):  
Reza Nabavizadeh ◽  
Benjamin Petrinec ◽  
Andrea Necchi ◽  
Igor Tsaur ◽  
Maarten Albersen ◽  
...  

Our aim is to review the benefits as well as techniques, surgical outcomes, and complications of minimally invasive inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) for penile cancer. The PubMed, Wiley Online Library, and Science Direct databases were reviewed in March 2020 for relevant studies limited to those published in English and within 2000–2020. Thirty-one articles describing minimally invasive ILND were identified for review. ILND has an important role in both staging and treatment of penile cancer. Minimally invasive technologies have been utilized to perform ILND in penile cancer patients with non-palpable inguinal lymph nodes and intermediate to high-risk primary tumors or patients with unilateral palpable non-fixed inguinal lymph nodes measuring less than 4 cm, including videoscopic endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) and robotic videoscopic endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (RVEIL). Current data suggest that VEIL and RVEIL are feasible and safe with minimal intra-operative complications. Perhaps the strongest appeal for the use of minimally-invasive approaches is their faster post-operative recovery and less post-operative complications. As a result, patients can tolerate this procedure better and surgeons can offer surgery to patients who otherwise would not be a candidate or personally willing to undergo surgery. When compared to open technique, VEIL and RVEIL have similar dissected nodal count, a surrogate metric for oncological adequacy, and a none-inferior inguinal recurrence rate. Larger randomized studies are encouraged to investigate long-term outcome and survival rates using these minimally-invasive techniques for ILND.


2017 ◽  
Vol 265 (1) ◽  
pp. 192-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
James W. Jakub ◽  
Alicia M. Terando ◽  
Amod Sarnaik ◽  
Charlotte E. Ariyan ◽  
Mark B. Faries ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. e74
Author(s):  
H. Abdel Mageed A. Motaal ◽  
M. Gamil Ramadan ◽  
M. mohamed safa ◽  
A. mostafa mahmoud ◽  
I. saad hussein

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document