scholarly journals Commentary on ‘Stroke/Death Rates Following Carotid Artery Stenting and Carotid Endarterectomy in Contemporary Administrative Dataset Registries: A Systematic Review’

2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
J.-B. Ricco
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Endarterectomy ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Death Rates ◽  
Administrative Dataset ◽  
Stroke Death

scholarly journals Transcarotid Artery Revascularization Versus Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting and Carotid Endarterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. e208-e209
Author(s):  
Isaac N. Naazie ◽  
Christina Cui ◽  
Osaghae Ikponmwosa ◽  
Mohammad Murad ◽  
Marc L. Schermerhorn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Endarterectomy ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Meta Analysis

Abstract WP133: Long-term Outcomes of Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting: Real-World Status of Single Institute in Japan

Stroke ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kohkichi Hosoda ◽  
Taichiro Imahori ◽  
Atsushi Fujita ◽  
Yusuke Yamamoto ◽  
Hidehito Kimura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Endarterectomy ◽  
Real World ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
End Point ◽  
Bilateral Carotid ◽  
Free Rate ◽  
Stroke Death

Introduction: We investigated long-term outcomes of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) in our hospital to assess the outcomes of real-world practice in single institute of Japan. Methods: Between August 2006 and July 2014, 236 consecutive carotid revascularizations with either CEA or CAS were performed in our institute. The initial treatment was regarded as the starting point in the cases of the patients who received treatment by bilateral carotid artery stenosis or retreatment. We assessed the long-term outcomes with survival analyses. Results: A total of 210 patients (CEA 128, CAS 82), including 94 symptomatic patients, were enrolled in the current study with mean follow-up period of 45.8 months. The periprocedural stroke/death/myocardial infarction (MI) rate was 3.1% for CEA and 4.9% for CAS groups (p=0.71). Estimates of the 4-year event-free rate from the primary end point (the composite of any stroke, death, or MI within 30 days and any ipsilateral stroke thereafter) using competing risk analysis were 3.1% for CEA and 8.6% for CAS (P=0.041). Kaplan-Meier estimates of the 4-year event-free rate from the secondary end point (the composite of any stroke, death, or MI within 30 days and any stroke or death thereafter) were 12.8% for CEA and 20.1% for CAS (P=0.051). Age (Hazard ratio [HR], 1.14/year [95%CI, 1.03-1.26]; p = 0.012) and CAS (HR, 3.5 [95%CI, 1.05-11.5]; p = 0.04 ) were significant predictors for the primary end point in multivariate analysis. For the secondary end point, age (HR, 2.1/10year [95%CI, 1.27-3.47]; p = 0.004) and CAS (HR, 2.0 [95%CI, 1.04-3.83], p = 0.037) were significant predictors. The inclusion of higher risk patients in the CAS group may have been the reason for CAS being a risk factor. Conclusion: The current study on real-world practices demonstrated perioperative and long-term outcomes that were comparable to previous major studies of large numbers of patients.

Carotid Artery Stenting Versus Carotid Endarterectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2009 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 586-596 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhenjie Liu ◽  
Zhenyu Shi ◽  
Yuqi Wang ◽  
Bin Chen ◽  
Ting Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Endarterectomy ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Meta Analysis
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document