scholarly journals Carotid Anatomy Does Not Predict the Risk of New Ischaemic Brain Lesions on Diffusion-Weighted Imaging after Carotid Artery Stenting in the ICSS-MRI Substudy

2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Doig ◽  
B.M. Hobson ◽  
M. Müller ◽  
H.R. Jäger ◽  
R.L. Featherstone ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-55
Author(s):  
Hongying Qu ◽  
Xiaokun Zhang ◽  
Miao Zhang ◽  
Yongan Gao ◽  
Jie Lu

Background Although carotid artery stenting achieves definite benefits, it carries a higher rate of embolization compared with carotid endarterectomy. The incidence of embolization may be related to plaque stability. Purpose To assess for any relationship between plaque characteristics and cerebral emboli following carotid artery stenting. Material and Methods Sixty-three patients with severe carotid stenosis underwent carotid artery stenting. They were divided into two groups according to whether new ischemic lesions were detected on diffusion-weighted imaging after carotid artery stenting. We evaluated the types and locations of calcification in plaques and extent of calcification. We then assessed for a correlation between each of these factors and occurrence of new lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging after carotid artery stenting. Results The locations of calcification, percentage of plaque enhancement, and the number of plaques with irregular surface or ulceration were significantly different between the two groups. A peripheral position of calcification (close to the adventitia), enhancing plaques, and plaques with irregular surfaces or ulceration were statistically significant predictors of intracerebral embolization after carotid artery stenting. No significant differences in type of plaque or degree of calcification were found between two groups. Conclusion Peripheral calcification, enhancing plaques, and plaques with irregular surfaces were risk factors for intracerebral embolization after carotid artery stenting. These plaque characteristics should be considered when choosing the optimal treatment for patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 1859-1870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murat Beyhan ◽  
Berat Acu ◽  
Erkan Gökçe ◽  
Mehmet Murat Fırat

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document