scholarly journals Radiation Dose Distribution in Endovascular Aneurysm Repair in the Hybrid Operating Room According to the Specific Phases of the Procedure

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. e17-e18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco V. Usai ◽  
Johannes Schäfers ◽  
Kevin Wunderle ◽  
Giovanni F. Torsello ◽  
Giuseppe Panuccio
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (6) ◽  
pp. 1881-1890 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quirina M.B. de Ruiter ◽  
Marloes M. Jansen ◽  
Frans L. Moll ◽  
Constantijn E.V.B. Hazenberg ◽  
Nicoletta N. Kahya ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 68 (5) ◽  
pp. 1281-1286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa L. Kirkwood ◽  
Khalil Chamseddin ◽  
Gary M. Arbique ◽  
Jeffrey B. Guild ◽  
David Timaran ◽  
...  

Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 846
Author(s):  
Yoshihiro Haga ◽  
Koichi Chida ◽  
Masahiro Sota ◽  
Yuji Kaga ◽  
Mitsuya Abe ◽  
...  

In recent years, endovascular treatment of aortic aneurysms has attracted considerable attention as a promising alternative to traditional surgery. Hybrid operating room systems (HORSs) are increasingly being used to perform endovascular procedures. The clinical benefits of endovascular treatments using HORSs are very clear, and these procedures are increasing in number. In procedures such as thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), wires and catheters are used to deliver and deploy the stent graft in the thoracic/abdominal aorta under fluoroscopic control, including DSA. Thus, the radiation dose to the patient is an important issue. We determined radiation dose indicators (the dose–area product (DAP) and air karma (AK) parameters) associated with endovascular treatments (EVAR and TEVAR) using a HORS. As a result, the mean ± standard deviation (SD) DAPs of TEVAR and EVAR were 323.7 ± 161.0 and 371.3 ± 186.0 Gy × cm2, respectively. The mean ± SD AKs of TEVAR and EVAR were 0.92 ± 0.44 and 1.11 ± 0.54 Gy, respectively. The mean ± SD fluoroscopy times of TEVAR and EVAR were 13.4 ± 7.1 and 23.2 ± 11.7 min, respectively. Patient radiation dose results in this study of endovascular treatments using HORSs showed no deterministic radiation effects, such as skin injuries. However, radiation exposure during TEVAR and EVAR cannot be ignored. The radiation dose should be evaluated in HORSs during endovascular treatments. Reducing/optimizing the radiation dose to the patient in HORSs is important.


2017 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. e90-e91
Author(s):  
Melissa Kirkwood ◽  
Khalil Chamseddin ◽  
Gary Arbique ◽  
Jeffrey Guild ◽  
David Timaran ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 4846-4856 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Tuthill ◽  
L. O’Hora ◽  
M. O’Donohoe ◽  
S. Panci ◽  
P. Gilligan ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 704-726 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard W Harbron ◽  
Mohamed Abdelhalim ◽  
Elizabeth A Ainsbury ◽  
Jonathan S Eakins ◽  
Azeem Alam ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document