Evaluating minority retention programs: Problems encountered and lessons learned from the Ohio science and engineering alliance

2008 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 277-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffry L. White ◽  
James W. Altschuld ◽  
Yi-Fang Lee
2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 2721-2738
Author(s):  
Thorsten Wagener ◽  
Dragan Savic ◽  
David Butler ◽  
Reza Ahmadian ◽  
Tom Arnot ◽  
...  

Abstract. The Water Informatics in Science and Engineering Centre for Doctoral Training (WISE CDT) offers a postgraduate programme that fosters enhanced levels of innovation and collaboration by training a cohort of engineers and scientists at the boundary of water informatics, science and engineering. The WISE CDT was established in 2014 with funding from the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) amongst the universities of Bath, Bristol, Cardiff and Exeter. The WISE CDT will ultimately graduate over 80 PhD candidates trained in a non-traditional 4-year UK doctoral programme that integrates teaching and research elements in close collaboration with a range of industrial partners. WISE focuses on cohort-based education and equips the PhD candidates with a wide range of skills developed through workshops and other activities to maximise candidate abilities and experiences. We discuss the need for, the structure and results of the WISE CDT, which has been ongoing from 2013–2022 (final year of graduation). We conclude with lessons learned and an outlook for PhD training, based on our experience with this programme.


2019 ◽  
Vol 374 (1771) ◽  
pp. 20180026 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hatice Gunes ◽  
Oya Celiktutan ◽  
Evangelos Sariyanidi

Communication with humans is a multi-faceted phenomenon where the emotions, personality and non-verbal behaviours, as well as the verbal behaviours, play a significant role, and human–robot interaction (HRI) technologies should respect this complexity to achieve efficient and seamless communication. In this paper, we describe the design and execution of five public demonstrations made with two HRI systems that aimed at automatically sensing and analysing human participants’ non-verbal behaviour and predicting their facial action units, facial expressions and personality in real time while they interacted with a small humanoid robot. We describe an overview of the challenges faced together with the lessons learned from those demonstrations in order to better inform the science and engineering fields to design and build better robots with more purposeful interaction capabilities. This article is part of the theme issue ‘From social brains to social robots: applying neurocognitive insights to human–robot interaction’.


2017 ◽  
pp. 1-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veljko Milutinović ◽  
Stasa Vujicic Stankovic ◽  
Aleksandar Jovic ◽  
Drazen Draskovic ◽  
Marko Misic ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 266-283
Author(s):  
Janice D. Taylor ◽  
Theodore K. Miller

Author(s):  
J. Alexander Liddle ◽  
Jerry Bowser ◽  
B. Robert Ilic ◽  
Vincent Luciani

Nanofabrication/characterization facilities enable research and development activities across a host of science and engineering disciplines. The collection of tools and supporting infrastructure necessary to construct, image, and measure micro- and nanoscale materials, devices, and systems is complex and expensive to establish, and it is costly to maintain and optimize. As a result, these facilities are typically operated in a shared-use mode. We discuss the key factors that must be considered to successfully create and sustain such facilities. These include the need for long-term vision and institutional commitment, and the hands-on involvement of managers in facility operations. We consider startup, operating, and recapitalization costs, together with algorithms for cost recovery and tool-time allocation. The acquisition of detailed and comprehensive project and tool-utilization data is essential for understanding and optimizing facility operations. Only such a data-driven decision-making approach can maximize facility impact on institutional goals. We illustrate these concepts using the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) NanoFab as our test case, but the methodologies and resources presented here should be useful to all those faced with this challenging task.


2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (9) ◽  
pp. 736-742
Author(s):  
Kenneth F Martinez ◽  
Jayne B Morrow

Risk mitigation of COVID-19 in the indoor environment requires an articulated strategy for creating a bridge between science and the business community that focuses on knitting together four core capabilities—environmental microbiology, transmission science, building science, and social science—advancing scientific knowledge. The purpose of this article is to share insights from the CLEAN 2020 Summit, which assembled leaders from business, policy, standards development, science, and engineering working to mitigate risk of transmission in the built environment. The Summit worked to assess current challenges and pain points felt by industries from around the globe as well as innovative solutions applied to meet these challenges. Although SARS-CoV-2 and the COVID-19 diseases are unique, the foundation of knowledge to assess and mitigate the risk of viral transmission in the built environment is robust. There are opportunities to improve science and engineering technology solutions, processes, and procedures to better meet the dynamic needs of the evolving pandemic.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document