Limb salvage for malignant bone tumours of distal tibia with dual ipsilateral vascularized autogenous fibular graft in a trapezoid-shaped array with ankle arthrodesis and preserving subtalar joint

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 278-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunlin Zhang ◽  
Bingfang Zeng ◽  
Kunpeng Zhu ◽  
Lei Zhang ◽  
Jianping Hu
2005 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 255-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Laitinen ◽  
J. Hardes ◽  
H. Ahrens ◽  
C. Gebert ◽  
B. Leidinger ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-9
Author(s):  
Mokhtar M Galila ◽  
Ebeid FS Fatma ◽  
Ishak AI Sherif ◽  
Ragab A Iman ◽  
Yousef AS Khaled

Abstract Objective Evaluate outcome of paediatric malignant bone tumours at Ain Shams University, Egypt, from January 2003 to July 2016. Methods Retrospective data analysis regarding clinico-epidemiological aspects, treatment outcomes, survival analysis and musculoskeletal tumour society score (MSTS score). Results The study included 37 patients; 22 had Ewing sarcoma (ES) and 15 had osteosarcoma, male: female ratio 0.85:1, median ages of 11. The overall frequency was 2.3% among all cancers. There is wide range of time lag until diagnosis. Patients with ES were significantly younger than those with osteosarcoma were. Swelling was the most common presenting symptom and femur was the most common affected site. Fifteen patients fulfilled MSTS criteria; most of them had excellent MSTS score, which significantly affected by type of surgery. ES patients were treated with POG#9354/CCG#7942 protocols and osteosarcoma with CCG#7921 protocol. Limb salvage was the most common type for surgical local control. Most common cause of death was relapse, whereas infection was the most common complication of treatment. 1-year, 2-year, 3-year overall-survival of osteosarcoma were 93.3%, 40%, and 13.3% respectively and 77.3%, 40.9%, and 18.2% respectively for ES. 1-year, 2-year, 3-year event-free-survival were 80%, 40%, and 13.3% respectively and 72.7%, 22.7%, and 18.2% respectively for ES patients. Conclusion Although survival rates for malignant bone tumours are still unsatisfactory, the functional outcome of extremity tumours after limb salvage procedures is promising


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiqing Zhao ◽  
Taiqiang Yan ◽  
Wei Guo ◽  
Rongli Yang ◽  
Xiaodong Tang

Abstract Background There are different surgical methods for primary malignant tumor located at distal tibia. Previous studies have reported that double-strut fibula ankle arthrodesis is an alternative option. The purpose of this study was to investigate the biomechanical effect of double-strut fibula ankle arthrodesis by finite element analysis (FEA). Methods Computer-aided design software was used to establish three-dimension models. Three different models were constructed: normal tibia-fibula-talus complex (model A), double-strut fibula ankle arthrodesis (model B), and reconstruction by ipsilateral fibula (model C). We used FEA to evaluate and compare the biomechanical characteristics of these constructs. Simulated load of 600 N was applied to the tibial plateau to simulate balanced single-foot standing. Output results representing the model von Mises stress and displacement of the components were analyzed. Results Construct stiffness was increased when the internal plate fixation was used. For axial load, model B (1460.5 N/mm) was stiffer than the construct of model A (524.8 N/mm), and model C (636.6 N/mm), indicating model B was more stable. Maximum stress on the fibular graft occurred on the proximal end. The von Mises stress and stress distribution of fibular graft in model B (71.4 MPa) and model C (67.8 MPa) were similar. In model B, the ipsilateral fibula in model B has a higher value of stress (16.1 MPa) than that in model A (0.5 MPa), indicating the ipsilateral fibula shared load after fusion with talus. Conclusions Our computational findings suggest that double-strut fibula ankle arthrodesis is an acceptable construct for distal tibia defect and the ipsilateral fibula shares load after fusion with talus.


2005 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 273-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Asavamongkolkul ◽  
R Pimolsanti ◽  
S Waikakul ◽  
P Kiatsevee

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document