Pregnancy after uterine fibroid embolization: follow-up of 100 patients embolized using tris-acryl gelatin microspheres

2008 ◽  
Vol 90 (6) ◽  
pp. 2356-2360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel Pinto Pabón ◽  
Javier Porras Magret ◽  
Elena Ayerbe Unzurrunzaga ◽  
Isidro Millán García ◽  
Isidoro Bruna Catalán ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 823-832 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard D. Shlansky-Goldberg ◽  
Mark A. Rosen ◽  
Jeffrey I. Mondschein ◽  
S. William Stavropoulos ◽  
Scott O. Trerotola ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 58 (8) ◽  
pp. 952-958 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stevo Duvnjak ◽  
Pernille Ravn ◽  
Anders Green ◽  
Poul Erik Andersen

2020 ◽  
Vol 61 (9) ◽  
pp. 1287-1296
Author(s):  
Terence P Farrell ◽  
Chris Garvey ◽  
Niamh C Adams ◽  
Douglas Mulholland ◽  
J Mark Ryan ◽  
...  

Background Uterine fibroid embolization (UFE) is an effective treatment for uterine leiomyomata. Optimizing the choice of embolic agents is imperative to achieve better patient outcomes with maximum resource utilization. Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of trisacryl gelatin microspheres (TAGM) versus combined TAGM and gelatin sponge (GS) embolization in the treatment of symptomatic uterine leiomyomata. Material and Methods Between July 2007 and December 2010, 106 consecutive patients underwent UFE with TAGM. Between January 2011 and December 2016, 123 consecutive patients underwent UFE with a combination of TAGM/GS. The primary outcomes were successful infarction rate (≥90% infarction) of the dominant leiomyoma and percentage reduction in uterine and dominant leiomyoma volume on MRI at six months. Secondary outcomes included adverse event rates, pain scores, and change in clinical symptoms at six months. The embolic agents utilized per procedure were recorded and a cost-effectiveness analysis was performed. Results Baseline characteristics of both groups were similar. Successful infarction was achieved in 93.2% of the TAGM group and 94.6% of the TAGM/GS group ( P = 0.52). Reduction in uterine volume (TAGM 40.7%, TAGM/GS 44.4%, P = 0.16) and dominant leiomyoma volume (TAGM 47.6%, TAGM/GS 50.1%, P = 0.29) at six months was similar. No significant difference was observed in symptom improvement at six months ( P = 0.8). The mean number of TAGM vials utilized and cost per procedure was 6.3 and $1688.40 for TAGM embolization and 3.6 and $979.50 for TAGM/GS embolization, respectively. Conclusion Primary and secondary outcomes were comparable when performing UFE with TAGM versus combined TAGM/GS. The combined use of TAGM/GS reduced the mean cost of embolic agents by 42%.


2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
James B. Spies ◽  
Curt Cornell ◽  
Robert Worthington-Kirsch ◽  
John C. Lipman ◽  
James F. Benenati

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 489-493
Author(s):  
Tahany Al-Mailo ◽  
Lulwa Abdullah AlTakroni

Purpose: To retrospectively determine the incidence of amenorrhea and premature ovarian failure in women who underwent uterine fibroid embolization (UFE) in King Fahad Specialist Hospital in Dammam (KFSH-D). Patients and methods: All women who had undergone UFE in KFSH-D from August 2007 to October 2015 were included for a total of 82 patients. Follow up consisted of a questionnaire inquiring about symptoms, improvement after the procedure and whether menstruation resumed or not. The pre-procedure and post-procedure pelvis MRI as well as UFE images and reports were reviewed for all patients.   Results: One patient (1.5 %) was found to have amenorrhea out of the 67 patients we were able to contact. She was 52 years old at the time of UFE and had irregular period. Menstruation did not resume following UFE along with menopausal symptoms including night sweats, mood swings and irritability, likely due to premature ovarian failure (POF). The rest of patients had normal resumption of menses.  Conclusion: The incidence of amenorrhea is less than what’s reported in the literature could be due to advances in UFE since its introduction as a treatment for uterine fibroids, likely due to advances in image quality, tans-catheter embolization equipments/techniques and embolic material used in UFE.


2002 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
John C. Lipman ◽  
Steven J. Smith ◽  
James B. Spies ◽  
Gary P. Siskin ◽  
Lindsay S. Machan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document