scholarly journals Prevalence and effect of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) on oocyte donation cycles in the United States: 2005 to 2013

2016 ◽  
Vol 106 (3) ◽  
pp. e330
Author(s):  
D.H. Barad ◽  
S. Darmon ◽  
V.A. Kushnir ◽  
E. Lazzaroni-Tealdi ◽  
Q. Wang ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 217 (5) ◽  
pp. 576.e1-576.e8 ◽  
Author(s):  
David H. Barad ◽  
Sarah K. Darmon ◽  
Vitaly A. Kushnir ◽  
David F. Albertini ◽  
Norbert Gleicher

Author(s):  
Guido Pennings ◽  
Edgar Mocanu ◽  
Janne Rothmar Herrmann ◽  
Anne-Bine Skytte ◽  
Corey Burke ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-241
Author(s):  
PETER HERISSONE-KELLY

It goes almost without saying that there are no academic bioethical debates that are unique to the United Kingdom. The debates in which U.K. bioethicists become involved take place in international journals and in books with a worldwide readership. The contributions of those from these shores are frequently made in response to work by academics from the United States, Australia, Scandinavia, and a whole host of other countries.


1992 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 739 ◽  
Author(s):  
HOD Critchley ◽  
DL Healy ◽  
CM King ◽  
JF Leeton

The concluding session of the symposium on Oocyte Donation held in Melbourne in November 1991 focused upon the practical aspects of an oocyte donation programme. A background is here provided to the many exogenous sex steroid replacement regimens and clinical management protocols employed by centres throughout Europe, the United States and Australia. The participants were asked to provide information about their own centres' protocols (Tables 1, 2 and 3). In addition, a panel considered a hypothetical request for oocyte donation. A summarized case history and the ensuing discussion concerning management is presented.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document