TOTAL MOTILE SPERM COUNT IS ASSOCIATED WITH ICSI SUCCESS USING SPERM OBTAINED BY TESE

2021 ◽  
Vol 116 (3) ◽  
pp. e24
Author(s):  
Raevti Bole ◽  
David Yang ◽  
Matthew Ziegelmann ◽  
Jessica L. Bleess ◽  
Colleen Miller ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-106
Author(s):  
Sara Mahmood Qureshi ◽  
Salma Kafeel ◽  
Riffat Bibi ◽  
Jawad Mohmand

Introduction: The unrestricted use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for non-male factor infertility is associated with adverse outcomes. Post-wash total motile sperm count (PW-TMSC) offers prognostic value to assess sperm quality and aid in the decision to perform in vitro fertilization (IVF) or ICSI. Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify the effect of PW-TMSC on fertilization rates in patients undergoing IVF cycles exclusively with non-male factor infertility. It also aimed to identify whether unnecessary ICSI could be avoided in such cases, thus maximizing optimal outcomes. Materials & Methods: We retrospectively analyzed age, semen volume, prewash TMSC, and PW-TMSC in 68 conventional IVF cycles of infertile couples with non-male factor infertility. Clinical characteristics including female age, number of follicles, level of estradiol on trigger day, mature cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) collected, were also included. Results: Incidence of <30% fertilization was significantly higher in the 4-<10 Million group compared with the ≥20 Million post-wash TMSC group (P<0.001). Furthermore, Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis revealed post-wash TMSC as a significant predictor (P<0.05) of total failed fertilization (TFF) and of ≥30% fertilization (P<0.05) with area under curve (AUC) of 0. 79 and 0.77, respectively, with a deemed cutoff of 10.89 Million. Conclusion: Post-wash TMSC is a good predictor of fertilization; it can help in avoiding potentially low or even total fertilization failure (TFF). A cut-off point of 10.89 Million or less should warrant the use of ICSI.


2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 1110-1121 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. M. Hamilton ◽  
M. Cissen ◽  
M. Brandes ◽  
J. M. J. Smeenk ◽  
J. P. de Bruin ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. e534-e535
Author(s):  
M. Smith ◽  
T. Tharakan ◽  
T. Stroud ◽  
E.T. Goh ◽  
M. Figueiredo ◽  
...  

Urology ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 497-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. Miller ◽  
Brent K. Hollenbeck ◽  
Gary D. Smith ◽  
John F. Randolph ◽  
Gregory M. Christman ◽  
...  

Urology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 120 ◽  
pp. 109-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nannan Thirumavalavan ◽  
Jason M. Scovell ◽  
Adithya Balasubramanian ◽  
Taylor P. Kohn ◽  
Byung Ji ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 203 ◽  
pp. e405-e406
Author(s):  
Hyung Ho Lee ◽  
Won Sik Jang ◽  
Ji Eun Heo ◽  
Jong Soo Lee ◽  
Ki Hong Kim ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document