Feasibility and Safety of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) for Treatment of Colorectal Tumors and Effectiveness of Measures to Prevent Complications. -Compared to Therapeutic Results from Gastric ESD-

2008 ◽  
Vol 67 (5) ◽  
pp. AB144
Author(s):  
Masakatsu Fukuzawa ◽  
Satoru Taira ◽  
Mikinori Kataoka ◽  
Hiroko Hara ◽  
Chizuko Manabe ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. 602-607 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshikazu Hayashi ◽  
Satoshi Shinozaki ◽  
Keijiro Sunada ◽  
Hiroyuki Sato ◽  
Yoshimasa Miura ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. 546-553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenjiro Shigita ◽  
Shiro Oka ◽  
Shinji Tanaka ◽  
Kyoku Sumimoto ◽  
Daiki Hirano ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 19 (s1) ◽  
pp. S30-S33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiro Oka ◽  
Shinji Tanaka ◽  
Iwao Kaneko ◽  
Hiroyuki Kanao ◽  
Kazuaki Chayama

2012 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. AB414
Author(s):  
Toshifumi Mitani ◽  
Shu Hoteya ◽  
Toshiro Iizuka ◽  
Osamu Ogawa ◽  
Masanori Nakamura ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 07 (05) ◽  
pp. E664-E671 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria Jimenez-Garcia ◽  
Masayoshi Yamada ◽  
Hiroaki Ikematsu ◽  
Hiroyuki Takamaru ◽  
Seiichiro Abe ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and study aims Surgery is the standard treatment for colon tumors associated with diverticulum. Use of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) to treat such tumors is controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and feasibility of ESD in treating superficial colorectal tumors situated near or involving diverticulum. Patients and methods Consecutive patients from two referral centers who had colorectal tumors near or involving diverticulum treated by ESD were retrospectively studied. Clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Results Of the 12 patients studied, six had tumors near diverticulum and six had tumors involving diverticulum. The overall en-bloc R0 resection rate, median tumor size and procedure time were 67 %, 26.5 mm (range, 15 – 80 mm) and 110 minutes (range, 50 – 220 minutes), respectively. For tumors near diverticulum group, the en-bloc R0 resection rate was 100 % and no adverse events (AEs) or residual/recurrent tumors were observed. In contrast, for intradiverticular tumors group, the en-bloc R0 resection rate was low at 33 %, and one AE (perforation) was observed. The diverticula were ≥ 6 mm in diameter in the patients with incomplete resection. However, all but one diverticulum was unrecognized before ESD. Two residual tumors were detected at the 12-month surveillance and one required surgery. Conclusions This case series indicates that ESD is safe and feasible for treating colorectal tumors near a diverticulum and might be feasible for tumors involving a diverticulum smaller than 6 mm. Selection for smaller diverticulum size may contribute to higher en-bloc R0 resection rates.


2017 ◽  
Vol 85 (5) ◽  
pp. AB44
Author(s):  
Kazuki Boda ◽  
Shinji Tanaka ◽  
Shiro Oka ◽  
Ken Yamashita ◽  
Kyoku Sumimoto ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document