Feeding by the heterotrophic nanoflagellate Katablepharis remigera on algal prey and its nationwide distribution in Korea

Harmful Algae ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 74 ◽  
pp. 30-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Hee Ok ◽  
Hae Jin Jeong ◽  
An Suk Lim ◽  
Sung Yeon Lee ◽  
So Jin Kim
Harmful Algae ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Parrow ◽  
JoAnn M. Burkholder ◽  
Nora J. Deamer ◽  
Cheng Zhang

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang Ah Park ◽  
Hae Jin Jeong ◽  
Jin Hee Ok ◽  
Hee Chang Kang ◽  
Ji Hyun You ◽  
...  

The newly described dinoflagellate, Shimiella gracilenta, is known to survive for approximately 1 month on the plastids of ingested prey cells during starvation, indicating kleptoplastidy. To understand the population dynamics of this dinoflagellate in marine planktonic food webs, its growth and mortality rate due to predation should be assessed. Thus, we investigated the feeding occurrence of eight common heterotrophic protists on S. gracilenta. We also determined the growth and ingestion rates of Oxyrrhis marina and the naked ciliate, Rimostrombidium sp. on S. gracilenta as a function of the prey concentration. The common heterotrophic dinoflagellates (HTDs) Gyrodinium dominans, O. marina, and Pfiesteria piscicida and a naked ciliate Rimostrombidium sp. were able to feed on S. gracilenta; whereas the HTDs Aduncodinium glandula, Gyrodinium jinhaense, Oblea rotunda, and Polykrikos kofoidii were not. Shimiella gracilenta supported positive growth of O. marina and Rimostrombidium sp. but did not support that of G. dominans and P. piscicida. With increasing prey concentrations, the growth and ingestion rates of O. marina and Rimostrombidium sp. on S. gracilenta increased and became saturated. The maximum growth rates of O. marina and Rimostrombidium sp. on S. gracilenta were 0.645 and 0.903 day−1, respectively. Furthermore, the maximum ingestion rates of O. marina and Rimostrombidium sp. on S. gracilenta were 0.11 ng C predator day−1 (1.6 cells predator−1 day−1) and 35 ng C predator day−1 (500 cells predator−1 day−1), respectively. The maximum ingestion rate of O. marina on S. gracilenta was lower than that on any other algal prey reported to date, although its maximum growth rate was moderate. In conclusion, S. gracilenta had only a few common heterotrophic protist predators but could support moderate growth rates of the predators. Thus, S. gracilenta may not be a common prey species for diverse heterotrophic protists but may be a suitable prey for a few heterotrophic protists.


2003 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens C. Nejstgaard ◽  
Marc E. Frischer ◽  
Caren L. Raule ◽  
Rita Gruebel ◽  
Kathleen E. Kohlberg ◽  
...  

Harmful Algae ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. 55-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nayani K. Vidyarathna ◽  
Emanuela Fiori ◽  
Veronica M. Lundgren ◽  
Edna Granéli
Keyword(s):  

Harmful Algae ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 68 ◽  
pp. 224-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Eun Kwon ◽  
Hae Jin Jeong ◽  
So Jin Kim ◽  
Se Hyeon Jang ◽  
Kyung Ha Lee ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chui Wei Bong ◽  
Choon Weng Lee

Heterotrophic nanoflagellate (HNF) grazing depends on both temperature and trophic status of an ecosystem. As most microbes already function at their temperature optimum in tropical waters, we hypothesised that HNF grazing rates would be higher in more productive sites such as estuaries than in less productive areas such as coastal waters. We sampled two estuaries and three coastal sites along the Straits of Malacca and the South China Sea near the Malaysia Peninsula. Bacterial abundance ranged 0.9–6.3 × 106 cells mL–1, whereas HNF abundance ranged 1.8–10.1 ×103 cells mL–1. Bacterial production ranged 1.1–12.7 × 105 cells mL–1 h–1, whereas HNF grazing rates were an order of magnitude lower at 1.0–78.5 × 104 cells mL–1 h–1. Bacterial abundance, net bacterial production and HNF grazing rates were higher in estuaries than coastal waters but HNF abundance did not differ between the two areas. Across all stations, HNF grazing rates increased with bacterial production, and accounted for ~33% of bacterial production. Our results suggest that in the tropical waters studied, there was a bacterial production–grazing imbalance. Other loss factors such as viral lysis, sedimentation or the presence of benthic filter feeders could account for this imbalance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document