Proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty with the Tactys® prosthesis: clinical and radiological outcomes at a mean 3.1 years’ follow-up

Author(s):  
Aude Lozano ◽  
Martin Cholley-Roulleau ◽  
Benjamin Degeorge ◽  
Gilles Dautel
2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Merle ◽  
F. Villani ◽  
B. Lallemand ◽  
L. Vaienti

The aim of this study is to assess outcomes of a lateral surgical approach for proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty with NeuFlex® silicone implants for primary degenerative osteoarthritis. We reviewed 51 arthroplasties performed on 43 patients. The mean follow up period was 36 months (range 18–42). The average preoperative range of motion (ROM) was 38°. The average postoperative ROM was 63°. In 21/51 (41%) cases, there was an average axial deviation of 17° (range 10–30°). VAS and Quick DASH scores improved. In 5/51 (10%) cases, further surgery was required. Our lateral approach seems to be effective and minimally invasive, providing adequate exposure. Contralateral incision and contralateral ligament reinforcement should be performed, whenever necessary, to improve lateral stability.


Hand ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 669-674
Author(s):  
Pieter W. Jordaan ◽  
Duncan McGuire ◽  
Michael W. Solomons

Background: In 2012, our unit published our experience with a pyrocarbon proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) implant. Due to high subsidence rates, a decision was made to change to a cemented surface replacement proximal interphalangeal joint (SR-PIPJ) implant. The purpose of this study was to assess whether the change to a cemented implant would improve the subsidence rates. Methods: Retrospective review of all patients who had a cemented SR-PIPJ arthroplasty performed from 2011 to 2013 with at least 12 months follow-up. Results: A total of 43 joints were included with an average follow-up of 26.5 months. There was a significant ( P = .02) improvement in arc of motion with an average satisfaction score of 3.3 (satisfied patient). Subsidence was noted in 26% of joints with a significant difference in range of motion ( P = .003) and patient satisfaction ( P = .001) between the group with and without subsidence. Conclusions: The change to a cemented implant resulted in satisfied patients with an improvement in range of motion. The rate of subsidence improved but remains unacceptably high.


2009 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 188-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Afifi ◽  
A. Richards ◽  
A. Medoro ◽  
D. Mercer ◽  
M. Moneim

Current approaches to the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint have potential complications and limitations. We present a dorsal approach that involves splitting the extensor tendon in the midline, detaching the insertion of the central slip and repairing the extensor tendon without reinserting the tendon into the base of the middle phalanx. A retrospective review of 16 digits that had the approach for a PIP joint arthroplasty with a mean follow up of 23 months found a postoperative PIP active ROM of 61° (range 25–90°). Fourteen digits had no extensor lag, while two digits had an extensor lag of 20° and 25°. This modified approach is fast and simple and does not cause an extensor lag.


2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (9) ◽  
pp. 910-916 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Flannery ◽  
O. Harley ◽  
R. Badge ◽  
A. Birch ◽  
D. Nuttall ◽  
...  

The MatOrtho proximal interphalangeal replacement is a cementless cobalt–chromium metal-on-polyethylene mobile-bearing surface replacement arthroplasty. The aim of this study is to report the outcome and complications of this implant at a minimum of 2 years follow-up from a single institution. A retrospective case review was performed on all MatOrtho proximal interphalangeal joint replacements performed with a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Patient demographics, diagnosis, implant revision and other surgical interventions were recorded. Subjective and objective outcomes were evaluated at latest follow-up, including pain scores, range of motion, function and radiographic assessment. A total of 109 implants were inserted in 56 patients. Nine implants (six patients) were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 100 implants, 75 had been undertaken in females. The mean age at time of surgery was 64 years and the principal diagnosis was osteoarthritis in 74%. The mean follow-up was 47 months (range 24–77). Within the group there was a statistically significant diminution in pain. There was also an improvement in functional scores post-operatively. Improvement in range of motion was seen in those joints with a pre-operative range of motion greater than 20°. Radiologically there was no evidence of loosening or of implant subsidence at final follow-up. The revision rate was 13%. Nine joints were revised to the NeuFlex (silicone rubber) prosthesis, three were converted to an arthrodesis and one had exchange of the MatOrtho prosthesis. The survival of the MatOrtho proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty was 85% at a minimum of 2-years follow-up. Patients can be advised that the procedure achieves good pain relief, improvement in functional scores and may improve range of motion. We would, however, caution against this implant’s use in joints that are either stiff or have significant deformity and/or instability pre-operatively.


2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 882-888 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.C. Watts ◽  
A.J. Hearnden ◽  
I.A. Trail ◽  
M.J. Hayton ◽  
D. Nuttall ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 524-529
Author(s):  
Jason J. Srnec ◽  
Eric R. Wagner ◽  
Marco Rizzo

We retrospectively reviewed and compared the outcomes and complications associated with 81 single digit and 168 multi-digit proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasties performed from 1998 to 2012 in 136 patients. Clinical outcomes were assessed with an average follow-up of 5.3 years for single digit and 5.9 years for multi-digit proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty. Comparing single versus multi-digit proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty, the reoperation-free survival was 67% and 68% at 5 years and 56% and 67% at 10 years, respectively. Furthermore, in comparison of single versus multi-digit proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty, the revision-free survival was 80% and 86% at 5 years and 80% and 85% at 10 years, respectively. Given the similar, or even slightly improved, rates of complications, reoperation, and revision surgery, proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty performed on multi-digits results in no worse outcomes compared with single digit proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty. Level of evidence: IV


2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 608-614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elvira Bodmer ◽  
Miriam Marks ◽  
Stefanie Hensler ◽  
Stephan Schindele ◽  
Daniel B. Herren

The objective was to compare outcomes of the volar, Chamay and tendon splitting approaches for proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty using a surface-replacing implant (CapFlex-PIP). One-hundred prospectively documented patients with a 2-year follow-up were included. Range of proximal interphalangeal joint motion, the brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and complications were analysed. Between baseline and follow-up, mean proximal interphalangeal joint motion increased for the volar (53° to 54°), Chamay (38° to 53°) and tendon splitting (40° to 61°) approaches. The volar approach yielded the greatest flexion and the highest extension deficit. The mean brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire scores at baseline and 2 years were 45 and 74 (volar), 45 and 66 (Chamay) and 41 and 75 (tendon splitting). Seven patients in the Chamay group and two in the volar group required a reoperation consisting of teno-/arthrolysis. The tendon splitting approach tended to result in the best outcomes that were associated with fewer complications compared with the volar and Chamay approaches. Level of evidence: IV


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document