Natural history of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy: Redefining the age range of clinical presentation

Heart Rhythm ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 892-893 ◽  
Author(s):  
Domenico Corrado ◽  
Alessandro Zorzi
2006 ◽  
pp. 391-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire F. Verschraegen ◽  
Charles R. Key ◽  
Raffit Hassan

2009 ◽  
Vol 67 (2a) ◽  
pp. 278-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas Perez de Vasconcellos ◽  
Juan Antônio Castro Flores ◽  
Mário Luiz Marques Conti ◽  
José Carlos Esteves Veiga ◽  
Carmen Lúcia Penteado Lancellotti

OBJECTIVE: To describe five cases of giant carotid cavernous aneurysms which evolved with spontaneous thrombosis of internal carotid artery (STICA), with emphasis at epidemiology, clinical presentation, natural history, related factors and neurological outcome. METHOD: There were 711 consecutives patients with 802 aneurysms with and without surgical treatment during a period of 19 years. We selected 35 patients with 40 carotid cavernous aneurysms (5%) of which 20 (50%) were giant aneurysms. Among those cases, 5 patients evolved with STICA (25%). Symptoms and findings at presentation were recorded and compared with those at outcome. RESULTS: Clinical presentation was commonly related to atherosclerotic factors such as elevated blood pressure (80%), diabetes mellitus (40%) and dislipidemy (40%). All patients presented with hemicranial headache, ophthalmparesy and retro bulbar pain, and after STICA all presented improvement of symptoms. After STICA, 4 patients had regression of deficit, 2 partial and 2 complete. Four patients had sensorial trigeminal neuropathy in V1 and V2 territories, also showing improvement of symptoms after STICA. CONCLUSION: STICA is a common outcome in giant carotid cavernous aneurysms, and is related with significant improvement of symptoms; however, it may be catastrophic for those patients without efficient collateral circulation.


2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Lucey ◽  
John M. Vierling

Circulation ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 143 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amelia S Wallace ◽  
Mary R Rooney ◽  
Justin Echouffo Tcheugui ◽  
Morgan Grams ◽  
Elizabeth Selvin

Background: Few studies have examined the natural history of prediabetes, specifically, regression to normoglycemia as well as progression to clinical diabetes. Furthermore, there are several definitions of prediabetes in current use. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort analysis of 8214 participants without diabetes who attended visit 2 (1990-1992) and visit 4 (1996-1998) of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. We used multinomial logistic regression to compare cumulative incidence of diabetes and regression to normoglycemia among persons meeting different definitions of prediabetes (American Diabetes Association criteria): fasting glucose (FG) 100-125 mg/dL; A1C 5.7-6.4%; or elevations in both tests (single-sample confirmatory). Incident diabetes was defined as a self-reported diagnosis, medication use, or both FG ≥ 126 mg/dL and A1C ≥ 6.5%; normoglycemia was defined as both FG < 100mg/dL and A1C < 5.7% and no diabetes diagnosis or medication use. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, and race-center. Results: The prevalence of prediabetes at visit 2 (age range, 46-69; 57% female; 17% black) was 37.6% (n=3089) based on FG criteria, 17.4% (n=1427) based on A1C criteria, and 10.6% (N=867) by both FG and A1C criteria. The 6-year cumulative incidence of diabetes was 7.2% in participants with FG-defined prediabetes, 17.1% in participants with A1C-defined prediabetes, and 22.4% in participants meeting both criteria. Among participants with prediabetes by FG criteria, regression to normoglycemia was 1.9 times as likely as progression to diabetes (14.0% vs. 7.2%). However, when prediabetes was defined by A1C and by confirmatory criteria, progression to diabetes was 1.5 times and 3.5 times more likely than regression to normoglycemia, respectively. Conclusions: Risks of progression to diabetes and regression to normoglycemia differed by prediabetes definition. Prediabetes identified by A1C criteria and single-sample confirmatory criteria identified people at highest risk for diabetes.


2008 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. S45
Author(s):  
A. De Santis ◽  
F. Gigliotti ◽  
F. Cristofari ◽  
S. Trapani ◽  
F. Giubilo ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 337-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allyson Daugherty

AbstractBy using a literature review, this article examines the implications of achondroplasia. The following areas are discussed: the clinical definition of the disease; the incidence, etiology, and pathogenesis; phenotypical characteristics and natural history of the disease; and management, recurrence risk, and genetic counseling. Lastly, implications for nursing in relation to achondroplasia are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document