Inferior alveolar nerve transposition and reposition for dental implant placement in edentulous or partially edentulous mandibles: a multicenter retrospective study

2013 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 656-659 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Lorean ◽  
F. Kablan ◽  
Z. Mazor ◽  
E. Mijiritsky ◽  
P. Russe ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 01 (02) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed J. Al-Juboori ◽  
Kuo Y. Yuen ◽  
Chua M. Hua ◽  
Omar F. Tawfiq ◽  
Hussien A. Al-Wakeel ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Wu ◽  
Lin Zhou ◽  
Jin Yang ◽  
Bao Zhang ◽  
Yanjun Lin ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives To compare the accuracy of dynamic navigation (DN) with a static surgical guide (SSG) for dental implant placement and the influence factors such as the experience of the surgeon and the implant sites. Methods and materials A total of 38 implants, which underwent the dynamic navigation, and 57 implants which underwent a static surgical guide were enrolled in the retrospective study. Coronal deviation, apical deviation, and angular deviation were compared between the DN and SSG groups, along with the different experience level of surgeons and implant sites in the DN group. Results There were no statistically significant differences between the DN and SSG groups, and the experience level of the surgeons and implant sites in the DN group. However, the apical deviation of the DN was slightly higher than the SSG group in the anterior teeth (P = 0.028), and the angular deviation of DN was smaller than the SSG group in the molar. Conclusion Dynamic navigation can achieve accurate implant placement as well as the static surgical guide. Additionally, the experience level of the surgeon and implant site do not influence the accuracy of dynamic navigation, while the accuracy of DN seems higher than the SSG in molar.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document