Pediatric cochlear implantation of children with eighth nerve deficiency

2012 ◽  
Vol 76 (10) ◽  
pp. 1442-1448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy M. Young ◽  
Francine M. Kim ◽  
Maura E. Ryan ◽  
Elizabeth Tournis ◽  
Stephanie Yaras
1992 ◽  
Vol 101 (12) ◽  
pp. 988-993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph B. Nadol ◽  
Wen-Zhuang Xu

Although the parameters that are most important for postoperative speech perception in cochlear implantation have not been identified, it is assumed that the numbers of remaining cochlear neurons and spiral ganglion cells in the implanted deaf ears are critical. In this study, we evaluated the correlation of the maximum diameter of the cochlear and vestibular nerve trunks with the number of spiral ganglion cells in horizontal sections of the temporal bone of 42 patients who were profoundly deaf during life, and in 5 patients with normal hearing. The maximum diameters of the cochlear, vestibular, and eighth cranial nerves were significantly smaller in the deaf population as compared to normal-hearing controls. In addition, the counts of the remaining spiral ganglion cells were significantly correlated with the maximum diameter of the cochlear (p = .0006), vestibular (p = .001), and eighth cranial nerves (p = .0003). The regression equation estimated that 25% of the variance of the spiral ganglion cell count was predicted by the maximum diameter of the eighth nerve. Although the results of this study suggest that preoperative radiographic imaging of the diameter of the eighth nerve may be helpful in predicting the residual spiral ganglion cell count, the wide variability of diameters of the eighth nerve in hearing and deaf subjects militates against this theoretic usefulness.


2004 ◽  
Vol 114 (12) ◽  
pp. 2252-2254 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Poetker ◽  
Christina L. Runge-Samuelson ◽  
Jill B. Firszt ◽  
P Ashley Wackym

2004 ◽  
Vol 5 (sup1) ◽  
pp. 211-212
Author(s):  
Haruo Yoshida ◽  
Yukihiko Kanda ◽  
Haruo Takahashi

2004 ◽  
Vol 5 (S1) ◽  
pp. 211-212
Author(s):  
Haruo Yoshida ◽  
Yukihiko Kanda ◽  
Haruo Takahashi

1999 ◽  
Vol 113 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert H. Temple ◽  
Patrick R. Axon ◽  
Richard T. Ramsden ◽  
Nesil Keles ◽  
Kemal Deger ◽  
...  

AbstractCochlear implantation has a limited but definite role in the rehabilitation of certain neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) patients. The presence of a dead ear either before, or after, tumour removal does not necessarily imply loss of function in the eighth nerve; in some instances the hearing loss will be cochlear. Promontory or round window electrical stimulation may help to identify those individuals with surviving eighth nerve function. In such patients multichannel cochlear implantation promises a better level of audition than the auditory brain stem implant. This paper highlights such a case and the management problems are discussed.


1963 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 359-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles I. Berlin

Hearing in mice has been difficult to measure behaviorally. With GSR as the basic tool, the sensitivity curve to pure tones in mice has been successfully outlined. The most sensitive frequency-intensity combination was 15 000 cps at 0-5 dB re: 0.0002 dyne/cm 2 , with responses noted from 1 000 to beyond 70 000 cps. Some problems of reliability of conditioning were encountered, as well as findings concerning the inverse relationship between the size of GSR to unattenuated tones and the sound pressure necessary to elicit conditioned responses at or near threshold. These data agree well with the sensitivity of single units of the eighth nerve of the mouse.


2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Bortfeld ◽  
Alec B. G. Sevy ◽  
Theodore J. Huppert ◽  
Ross E. Tonini ◽  
Michael S. Beauchamp ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document