prelingually deaf
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

175
(FIVE YEARS 27)

H-INDEX

26
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monika Matusiak ◽  
Dominika Oziębło ◽  
Monika Ołdak ◽  
Emilia Rejmak ◽  
Leszek Kaczmarek ◽  
...  

Abstract Because of vast variability of cochlear implantation outcomes in prelingual deafness treatment, identification of good and poor performers remains a challenging task. To address this issue, we investigated genetic variants of matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) and brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and plasma levels of MMP-9, BDNF, and pro-BDNF that have all been implicated in neuroplasticity after sensory deprivation in the auditory pathway. We recruited a cohort of prelingually deaf children, all implanted before the age of 2, and carried out a prospective observation (N = 61). Next, we analyzed the association between (i) functional MMP9 (rs20445, rs1839242, rs2234681) and BDNF (rs6265) gene variants (and their respective protein levels) and (ii) the child’s auditory development as measured with the LittlEARS Questionnaire (LEAQ) before cochlear implant (CI) activation and at 8 and 18 months post-CI activation. Statistical analyses revealed that the plasma level of MMP-9 measured at implantation in prelingually deaf children was significantly correlated with the LEAQ score 18 months after CI activation. In the subgroup of DFNB1-related deafness (N = 40), rs3918242 of MMP9 was significantly associated with LEAQ score at 18 months after CI activation; also, according to a multiple regression model, the ratio of plasma levels of pro-BDNF/BDNF measured at implantation was a significant predictor of overall LEAQ score at follow-up. In the subgroup with DFNB1-related deafness, who had CI activation after 1 year old (N = 22), a multiple regression model showed that rs3918242 of MMP9 was a significant predictor of overall LEAQ score at follow-up.


Diogenes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Roydeva ◽  
◽  
◽  

Specialized psychotherapy for deaf people is still a young field of scientific research. The article describes collaboration and interaction between a therapist and a prelingually deaf person. This special collaborative relationship has several dimensions: language, Deaf culture, interpreting.


Author(s):  
Paul Miller ◽  
Efrat Banado-Aviran ◽  
Orit E Hetzroni

Abstract The aim of this study was to clarify whether fingerspelling provides a sophisticated mechanism that promotes the development of detailed orthographic knowledge for deaf individuals even in the absence of paralleling phonological knowledge. An intervention program comprised of various procedures chaining between fingerspelled sequences; their written correlates and meaning were administered in a multiple probe single-subject research design across semantic categories to four children with severe to profound prelingual hearing loss (age 4.2–6 years). Results demonstrate the occurrence of rapid orthographic learning during intervention and reliable retention of it in maintenance checks, despite the participants’ insufficiently developed phonological skills. Observations of the participants’ behavior further suggest fingerspelling to function as an effective mediator in the initial development of robust detailed orthographic lexicon. Analyzes also indicate that “learning through action” and “relevance to the task” provide two key factors in relation to the promotion of orthographic learning, with their absence creating an obvious vacuum in this regard. Insights from the study are discussed with reference to their implication for the development of learning materials and learning environments for prelingually deaf and other novice learners.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Suess ◽  
Anne Hauswald ◽  
Verena Zehentner ◽  
Jessica Depireux ◽  
Gudrun Herzog ◽  
...  

Visual input is crucial for understanding speech under noisy conditions, but there are hardly any tools to assess the individual ability to lip read. With this study, we wanted to (1) investigate how linguistic characteristics of language on the one hand and hearing impairment on the other hand have an impact on lip reading abilities and (2) provide a tool to assess lip reading abilities for German speakers. 170 participants (22 prelingually deaf) completed the online assessment, which consisted of a subjective hearing impairment scale and silent videos in which different item categories (numbers, words, and sentences) were spoken and the task for our participants was to recognize the spoken stimuli just by visual inspection. We used different versions of one test and investigated the impact of item categories, word frequency in the spoken language, articulation, sentence frequency in the spoken language, sentence length, and differences between speakers on the recognition score. We found an effect of item categories, articulation, sentence frequency, and sentence length on the recognition score, but no effect of word frequency or version of the test. With respect to hearing impairment we found that higher subjective hearing impairment is associated with higher test score. We did not find any evidence that prelingually deaf individuals show enhanced lip reading skills over people with postlingual acquired hearing impairment. However, we see an effect of education on enhanced lip reading skills only in the prelingual deaf, but not in the population with postlingual acquired hearing loss. This points to the fact that there are different factors contributing to enhanced lip reading abilities depending on the onset of hearing impairment. Overall, lip reading skills vary strongly in the general population independent of hearing impairment. Based on our findings we constructed a new and efficient lipreading assessment tool (SaLT) that can be used to test behavioural lip reading abilities in the German speaking population.


2021 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 683-690
Author(s):  
Terrin N. Tamati ◽  
David B. Pisoni ◽  
Aaron C. Moberly

Purpose This preliminary research examined (a) the perception of two common sources of indexical variability in speech—regional dialects and foreign accents, and (b) the relation between indexical processing and sentence recognition among prelingually deaf, long-term cochlear implant (CI) users and normal-hearing (NH) peers. Method Forty-three prelingually deaf adolescent and adult CI users and 44 NH peers completed a regional dialect categorization task, which consisted of identifying the region of origin of an unfamiliar talker from six dialect regions of the United States. They also completed an intelligibility rating task, which consisted of rating the intelligibility of short sentences produced by native and nonnative (foreign-accented) speakers of American English on a scale from 1 ( not intelligible at all ) to 7 ( very intelligible ). Individual performance was compared to demographic factors and sentence recognition scores. Results Both CI and NH groups demonstrated difficulty with regional dialect categorization, but NH listeners significantly outperformed the CI users. In the intelligibility rating task, both CI and NH listeners rated foreign-accented sentences as less intelligible than native sentences; however, CI users perceived smaller differences in intelligibility between native and foreign-accented sentences. Sensitivity to accent differences was related to sentence recognition accuracy in CI users. Conclusions Prelingually deaf, long-term CI users are sensitive to accent variability in speech, but less so than NH peers. Additionally, individual differences in CI users' sensitivity to indexical variability was related to sentence recognition abilities, suggesting a common source of difficulty in the perception and encoding of fine acoustic–phonetic details in speech.


2020 ◽  
Vol 61 (6) ◽  
pp. 830-833
Author(s):  
David S. Thylur ◽  
Jenny L. Singleton ◽  
Ann C. Schwartz
Keyword(s):  

NeuroImage ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 220 ◽  
pp. 117042 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manja Hribar ◽  
Dušan Šuput ◽  
Saba Battelino ◽  
Andrej Vovk

Author(s):  
William G. Kronenberger ◽  
Hannah Bozell ◽  
Shirley C. Henning ◽  
Caitlin J. Montgomery ◽  
Allison M. Ditmars ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document