Long Term Results of a Phase II Trial of Hyperfractionated Radiation and Intraarterial Cisplatin (HYPERRADPLAT) on Stage III-IV Head and Neck Cancer With Bulky Primary Tumors

Author(s):  
G.W. Warren ◽  
S. Arnold ◽  
J. Valentino ◽  
Y. Brill ◽  
W. Regine ◽  
...  
1997 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 1152-1155 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Dinges ◽  
V. Budach ◽  
M. Stuschke ◽  
W. Budach ◽  
D. Boehmer ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 94 (4) ◽  
pp. 453-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alejandro De La Torre ◽  
Jesus Romero ◽  
Angel Montero ◽  
M Isabel Garcia-Berrocal ◽  
Francisco J Valcarcel ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 212-212
Author(s):  
Narek Shaverdian ◽  
John Hegde ◽  
Carol Felix ◽  
Sophia Hsu ◽  
Jordan Garst ◽  
...  

212 Background: We present the first data evaluating overall treatment priorities, priorities specific to de-escalated therapy, treatment regret, and original expectations versus actual experiences among patients treated with de-escalated chemoradiation for human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive head and neck cancer (HNSCC). Methods: Participants were treated on a prospective phase II trial of induction chemotherapy followed by attenuated chemoradiotherapy for HPV-positive HNSCC. Eligible patients presented with stage III or IV squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, p16-positivity, age ≥ 18 years, and Zubrod score 0-1. A total tumor dose of 60 Gy or 54 Gy was delivered depending on the response to induction chemotherapy. Participants were surveyed with validated measures evaluating their treatment experience. Results: Twenty-four out of 26 (92%) study patients participated with a median post-treatment follow-up of 20 months. 96% (n = 23) of participants selected ‘being cured’ or ‘living as long as possible’ to be their top priority. The highest-ranked priority with respect to treatment de-escalation was ‘to be able to swallow all foods and drinks’. No patient professed to any regret about the decision to enroll and be treated on a de-escalation protocol. 67% (n = 16) of participants reported long-term swallowing function to be either better than or as originally expected. 71% (n = 17) found long-term salivary function to be worse than expected. Overall, 63% (n = 15) of respondents found the severity of short-term side effects to be greater than expected, however, 63% (n = 15) of respondents found overall long-term toxicities to be less than originally expected. Conclusions: Among HPV-positive patients with HNSCC who had completed de-escalated therapy on a phase II protocol, cancer cure was the top overall priority, and preserving swallowing function was the highest priority for de-escalated therapy. No patient endorsed treatment regret, and the majority of patients found long-term swallowing outcomes to be better than or as originally expected. These data support ongoing studies aiming to establish the role of de-escalated therapies for HPV-positive HNSCC.


2017 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. e91-e92
Author(s):  
Roy W. Jones ◽  
Adam Tanious ◽  
Paul Armstrong ◽  
Neil Moudgill ◽  
Karl A. Illig ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Matsuzuka ◽  
Naomi Kiyota ◽  
Junki Mizusawa ◽  
Tetsuo Akimoto ◽  
Masato Fujii ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document