Radiation Resource Utilization and Cost of Care of the Patient with Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Author(s):  
A.T. Berman ◽  
N. Crimins ◽  
P.E. Gabriel ◽  
E. Aakhus ◽  
J. Braun ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. e346-e352 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Jackman ◽  
Yichen Zhang ◽  
Carole Dalby ◽  
Tom Nguyen ◽  
Julia Nagle ◽  
...  

Purpose: Increasing costs and medical complexity are significant challenges in modern oncology. We explored the use of clinical pathways to support clinical decision making and manage resources prospectively across our network. Materials and Methods: We created customized lung cancer pathways and partnered with a commercial vendor to provide a Web-based platform for real-time decision support and post-treatment data aggregation. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) Pathways for non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were introduced in January 2014. We identified all DFCI patients who were diagnosed and treated for stage IV NSCLC in 2012 (before pathways) and 2014 (after pathways). Costs of care were determined for 1 year from the time of diagnosis. Results: Pre- and postpathway cohorts included 160 and 210 patients with stage IV NSCLC, respectively. The prepathway group had more women but was otherwise similarly matched for demographic and tumor characteristics. The total 12-month cost of care (adjusted for age, sex, race, distance to DFCI, clinical trial enrollment, and EGFR and ALK status) demonstrated a $15,013 savings after the implementation of pathways ($67,050 before pathways v $52,037 after pathways). Antineoplastics were the largest source of cost savings. Clinical outcomes were not compromised, with similar median overall survival times (10.7 months before v 11.2 months after pathways; P = .08). Conclusion: After introduction of a clinical pathway in metastatic NSCLC, cost of care decreased significantly, with no compromise in survival. In an era where comparative outcomes analysis and value assessment are increasingly important, the implementation of clinical pathways may provide a means to coalesce and disseminate institutional expertise and track and learn from care decisions.


2018 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S34
Author(s):  
H. Loponen ◽  
V. Vihervaara ◽  
S. Ylä-Viteli ◽  
S. Torvinen ◽  
K. Tamminen ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (8_suppl) ◽  
pp. 216-216
Author(s):  
Erin Aakhus ◽  
Abigail T. Berman ◽  
Neil Crimins ◽  
Peter Edward Gabriel ◽  
Jennifer Braun ◽  
...  

216 Background: Cost of care of cancer patients near the end of life is a focus for payers and others. The breakdown of costs during this period for patients with Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are shifting as therapeutic choices change. We measured and reported variation in utilization, by oncologist, aiming to improve standardization and reduce utilization while maintaining or increasing the quality of care. Methods: Within the University of Pennsylvania Health System (UPHS), we identified all deceased patients with Stage IV NSCLC with first contact of 1/3/2011 to date of death of 4/10/2016, at least 1 chemotherapy visit, and 6 months between first contact and death (N=175). We captured all inpatient and outpatient charges within 6 months of patient death. Results: The median gross total charge per patient was $209,637 (interquartile range, $121,517-$371,196), which consisted of 39% outpatient infusions, 23% radiation therapy, 18% inpatient medical admissions, 11% outpatient radiology, 4.5% professional charges, and <1% ED visits. Infusions of pemetrexed and bevacizumab accounted for 7.3% and 6.1% of the gross total charges, respectively. Only 13/175 (7.4%) of patients received infusions within 14 days of death. Primary oncologist was not found to be a significant driver of variation in total, outpatient, or inpatient gross charges per patient (p=0.097, 0.208, 0.297). However, we showed that professional charges and use of outpatient radiology differed by oncologist (p=0.039, 0.003). We also identified oncologist-driven differences in use of supportive care drugs pegfilgrastim, darbepoietin, and denosumab (p=0.002, <0.001, <0.001). We detected no differences in use of pemetrexed or bevacizumab (p=0.835, 0.521). The differences in number of infusion visits approached significance (p=0.058). Conclusions: Outpatient infusions and radiation therapy were the largest contributors to healthcare resource utilization in the care of Stage IV NSCLC patients in the last 6 months of life. Variation in utilization by primary oncologist was detected in professional charges, outpatient radiology, and the use of supportive care (but not chemotherapeutic) agents.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (8_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3-3
Author(s):  
Yichen Zhang ◽  
Belen Fraile ◽  
Carole Kathleen Dalby ◽  
Tom Nguyen ◽  
Julia Nagle ◽  
...  

3 Background: Oncologists face challenges associated with increasing cost and medical complexity. The Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) has created a customized clinical pathways program that seeks to prospectively support and guide medical decision-making across our network. It also allows the Institute to track and learn from the medical decisions made. We have analyzed cost and outcomes data from before and after the implementation of Dana-Farber Pathways in our thoracic oncology program. Methods: Our lung cancer group created a customized clinical pathway for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We partnered with Via Oncology to provide a web-based platform for real-time pathway navigation and post-treatment data aggregation. DFCI Pathways for NSCLC went live in January 2014. We identified all patients who were diagnosed with and treated for stage IV NSCLC in 2012 (pre-pathways) and 2014 (post-pathways). Demographics, clinical characteristics, treatments, and clinical outcomes were captured. Costs of care for each patient were determined for one year from the time of diagnosis. Results: We identified a total of 160 Stage IV NSCLC patients diagnosed in 2012, and 210 patients diagnosed in 2014. The pretreatment group had more women (61% vs. 50%) but was otherwise similarly matched in terms of smoking status and presence of targetable changes in EGFR and ALK. The total 12-month cost of care (adjusted for age, sex, race, distance to DFCI, clinical trial enrollment, and EGFR and ALK status) demonstrated a $15,013 savings after the implementation of pathways ($67,050 pre, $52,037 post). Clinical outcomes were not compromised, with no significant difference in median overall survival (10.7 months pre, 11.2 months post; p = 0.08). Conclusions: In an era where comparative outcomes analysis and value assessment are increasingly important, the implementation of a clinical pathways program can provide a means to harness and deploy institutional expertise and track and learn from care decisions. Patients treated after the implementation of a clinical pathways program in lung cancer saw preserved clinical outcomes and a significant decrease in cost of care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document