83.0 Psychiatric Crisis Services for Children and Families: Mobilizing Resources and Thinking “Outside the Box” to Meet Community Needs

2017 ◽  
Vol 56 (10) ◽  
pp. S122-S123
Author(s):  
Kristina Sowar ◽  
Jennifer Havens
2016 ◽  
Vol 71 ◽  
pp. 103-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey J. Vanderploeg ◽  
Jack J. Lu ◽  
Timothy M. Marshall ◽  
Kristina Stevens

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S2) ◽  
pp. 2002-2002
Author(s):  
C. Mulder ◽  
R. de Leeuw

IntroductionThe organisation of emergency psychiatry varies between European countries. Our aim is to describe the organisation of emergency psychiatry in the Netherlands, including relevant epidemiological data.MethodsThe organisation of emergency psychiatry in the Netherlands was assessed using written material, official statistics and a recent study about the organisation of outpatient crisis services.ResultsIn the Netherlands, most psychiatric emergency services are being delivered by three levels of care: primary care physicians, outpatient crisis services and inpatient admission units. The outpatient psychiatric crisis services constitute the key factor in the emergency psychiatric care, as they do most assessments (triage), short term crisis interventions and referral. Outpatient crisis services are available 24/7, and are mainly staffed by physicians (including psychiatrists) and psychiatric nurses. Usually, patients first consult a primary care physician in case of a psychiatric crisis situation, which can be followed by a referral to an outpatient emergency crisis service in the local region. Patients can also be referred by mental health clinicians (for example for triage for involuntary admission), the police or emergency departments of general hospitals. The outpatient crisis services perform diagnostic and risk assessments (triage), short term crisis interventions, and decide on referral to other services. These can be specialized outpatient programs or (in)voluntary admission to a psychiatric hospital. The number of crisis contacts per 100.000 inhabitants varies between regions, depending e.g. on population density. For example 400 crisis contacts per 100.000 inhabitants were registered in 2003 in the urban region of The Hague, versus 200 per 100.000 in a surrounding rural area. As a mean 20% of patients are being referred to a psychiatric hospital, half of them involuntarily. The number of crisis contacts, voluntary admissions, as well as involuntary admissions rises steadily in The Netherlands. In 1978, 17 per 100.000 inhabitants were admitted involuntarily, as compared to 50 in 2009. Reasons for involuntary admission include self harm, harm to others and severe self neglect. Involuntary admission for reason of severe self neglect is increasing over the last ten years. As a seperate phenomenon, ethnic minority groups, especially from Antillean, Surinam and Moroccan descent, are over-representated in outpatient as well as inpatient emergency services in the urban areas.ConclusionOutpatient crisis services constitute the key factor in the organisation of emergency psychiatric services in The Netherlands. The last decade, the number of crisiscontacts, as well as the number of (in)voluntary admissions did rise.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda A. Dimeff ◽  
David A. Jobs ◽  
Kelly Koerner ◽  
Nadia Kako ◽  
Topher Jerome ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Emergency departments (EDs) offer the promise of providing suicide prevention evidence-based practices at the point of need to patients who are acutely suicidal. However, few EDs have adequate time and personnel resources to deliver recommended evidence-based assessment and interventions. We developed Jaspr Health, a tablet-based application that enables the delivery of four evidence-based practices for patients who are acutely suicidal at the point of need to help raise the standard of care in ED settings. OBJECTIVE This study aims to test the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of Jaspr Health among suicidal adults in EDs. METHODS Patients who were acutely suicidal and seeking psychiatric crisis services participated in a pilot randomized controlled trial while in the ED. Participants were assigned randomly to Jaspr Health (n=14) or care-as-usual (CAU) control (n=17). RESULTS Conditions differed significantly at baseline on age, but not on other demographic variables or baseline measures. On average, participants had been in the ED for 17 hours prior to enrolling in the research study. Over their lifetimes, 74% of the sample had made a suicide attempt (M=3.4; SD=6.4) and 61% had engaged in non-suicidal self-injurious behaviors, with an average rate of 8.8 times in the past three months. All established feasibility and acceptability criterion were met: no adverse events occurred, participants’ app usage was high, Jaspr Health app satisfaction ratings were high, and all Jaspr Health participants recommended its use for other suicidal ED patients. Comparisons between study conditions further support the application’s effectiveness: Jaspr Health participants reported a statistically significant increase in receiving four evidence-based suicide prevention interventions. Additionally, significant decreases in distress and agitation along with significant increases in learning to cope more effectively with current and future suicidal thoughts were observed among the Jaspr Health participants. Finally, in comparison to CAU, Jaspr Health participants provided higher satisfaction ratings of their overall ED experience. CONCLUSIONS Even with limited statistical power, results showed Jaspr Health to be feasible, acceptable, and clinically effective for use with ED patients who are acutely suicidal and seeking ED-based psychiatric crisis services. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03584386


Author(s):  
Anna Maria Rosso ◽  
Andrea Camoirano ◽  
Gabriele Schiaffino

Abstract. The aim of this study was to collect a Rorschach Comprehensive System (RCS) adult nonpatient sample from Italy using more stringent exclusion criteria and controlling for psychopathology, taking into account the methodological suggestions of Ritzler and Sciara (2008) . The authors hypothesized that: (a) adult nonpatient samples are not truly psychologically healthy, in that a high number of psychopathological symptoms are experienced by participants, particularly anxiety and depression, although they have never been in psychological treatment; (b) significant differences emerge between healthy and nonhealthy groups on Rorschach variables, particularly on CS psychopathological indexes; (c) RCS psychopathological indexes are significantly correlated in the expected direction with scores on psychopathological scales. The results confirmed the hypotheses, indicating the need to collect psychologically healthy samples in addition to normative and nonpatient samples. Because differences were found in the comparison between Exner’s sample (2007) and the healthy group in this study regarding form quality and coping styles, the authors suggest that future research should investigate the construct validity of ambitent style and culturally specific influences on form quality. Moreover, the Rorschach scientific community needs to have more extensive form quality tables, enriched with objects that are currently not included.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document