Important Strategies to Reduce Occupational Radiation Exposure in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory

2018 ◽  
Vol 71 (11) ◽  
pp. 1255-1258
Author(s):  
John W. Hirshfeld ◽  
Paul N. Fiorilli ◽  
Frank E. Silvestry
Author(s):  
Amy E. Cheney ◽  
Logan L. Vincent ◽  
James M. McCabe ◽  
Kathleen E. Kearney

Concerns over radiation exposure are ubiquitous to all interventional cardiologists; however, fear of exposure during childbearing years disproportionately deters women from entering the field. This review summarizes the available data on occupational radiation exposure during pregnancy with an emphasis on radiation quantification, the impact of exposure at various stages of fetal development, societal recommendations for safe levels of exposure during gestation, threshold levels necessary to induce fetal harm, and safe practices for the pregnant interventionalist. Reconciling the available information, we conclude that pregnancy in the cardiac catheterization laboratory is both safe and feasible. This review also highlights new technologies that may augment standard radiation safety techniques and are of particular interest to the pregnant interventional cardiologist. Finally, we propose steps to improve female representation in this field, underscoring the importance of a sex-balanced workforce.


2019 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmelo J. Panetta ◽  
Erin M. Galbraith ◽  
Marat Yanavitski ◽  
Patrick K. Koller ◽  
Binita Shah ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Ertel ◽  
Jeffrey Nadelson ◽  
Adhir R. Shroff ◽  
Ranya Sweis ◽  
Dean Ferrera ◽  
...  

Objectives. Radiation scatter protection shield drapes have been designed with the goal of decreasing radiation dose to the operators during transfemoral catheterization. We sought to investigate the impact on operator radiation exposure of various shielding drapes specifically designed for the radial approach. Background. Radial access for cardiac catheterization has increased due to improved patient comfort and decreased bleeding complications. There are concerns for increased radiation exposure to patients and operators. Methods. Radiation doses to a simulated operator were measured with a RadCal Dosimeter in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. The mock patient was a 97.5 kg fission product phantom. Three lead-free drape designs were studied. The drapes were placed just proximal to the right wrist and extended medially to phantom’s trunk. Simulated diagnostic coronary angiography included 6 minutes of fluoroscopy time and 32 seconds of cineangiography time at 4 standard angulated views (8 s each), both 15 frames/s. ANOVA with Bonferroni correction was used for statistical analysis. Results. All drape designs led to substantial reductions in operator radiation exposure compared to control (P<0.0001). The greatest decrease in radiation exposure (72%) was with the L-shaped design. Conclusions. Dedicated radial shielding drapes decrease radiation exposure to the operator by up to 72% during simulated cardiac catheterization.


2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 167-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alejandro Gutiérrez-Barrios ◽  
Hugo Camacho-Galán ◽  
Francisco Medina-Camacho ◽  
Dolores Cañadas-Pruaño ◽  
Antonio Jimenez-Moreno ◽  
...  

Exposure to ionizing radiation during cardiac catheterization can have harmful consequences for patients and for the medical staff involved in the procedures. Minimizing radiation doses during the procedures is essential. We investigated whether fine-tuning the radiation protocol reduces radiation doses in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. In January 2016, we implemented a new protocol with reduced radiation doses in the Hospital de Jerez catheterization laboratory. We analyzed 170 consecutive coronary interventional procedures (85 of which were performed after the new protocol was implemented) and the personal dosimeters of the interventional cardiologists who performed the procedures. Overall, the low-radiation protocol reduced air kerma (dose of radiation) by 44.9% (95% CI, 18.4%–70.8%; P=0.001). The dose-area product decreased by 61% (95% CI, 30.2%–90.1%; P &lt;0.001) during percutaneous coronary interventions. We also found that the annual deep (79%, P=0.026) and shallow (62.2%, P=0.035) radiation doses to which primary operators were exposed decreased significantly under the low-radiation protocol. These dose reductions were achieved without increasing the volume of contrast media, fluoroscopy time, or rates of procedural complications, and without reducing the productivity of the laboratory. Optimizing the radiation safety protocol effectively reduced radiation exposure in patients and operators during cardiac catheterization procedures.


2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 558-566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shikhar Agarwal ◽  
Akhil Parashar ◽  
Navkaranbir Singh Bajaj ◽  
Imran Khan ◽  
Imran Ahmad ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 532
Author(s):  
Samir V. Germanwala ◽  
Venkatraman Srinivasan ◽  
Leslie Boltey ◽  
Holly James ◽  
Alan Gradman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document