scholarly journals TCT CONNECT-131 Outcomes in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Anemia Requiring Red Blood Cell Transfusion: A Nationwide Prospective

2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (17) ◽  
pp. B57-B58
Author(s):  
Ali Ghani ◽  
Sundeep Kumar ◽  
Ziad SayedAhmad ◽  
Hiren Patel ◽  
Akhil Mogalapalli ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Seyed Hossein Aalaei-Andabili ◽  
R. David Anderson ◽  
Anthony A. Bavry ◽  
Brian Barr ◽  
George J. Arnaoutakis ◽  
...  

Objective Elevated red blood cell distribution width (RDW) level has been shown to be associated with poor outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. Limited data are available regarding the prognostic value of RDW in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) patients. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the impact of RDW variation on outcomes of TAVR patients. Methods From March 20, 2012, to February 20, 2020, the pre-TAVR RDW levels of 1,163 consecutive TAVR patients were examined. Receiver operating curves were set to define the most accurate cut-point, which was subsequently validated in our validation set. Associations of RDW levels with early and long-term outcomes were investigated. Results A total of 988 patients were eligible for the analysis. Patients with 30-day, 1-year, and 7-year mortality had significantly higher pre-TAVR RDW levels (15.8% [12.9-19.1] vs 14.7% [11.6-26.3], P = 0.01; 16% [12.3-26.3] vs 14.7% [11.6-24.3], P < 0.001; 15.6% [12.3-26.3] vs 14.6% [11.6-24.3], P < 0.001, respectively). A RDW of 14.5% was found as the most sensitive and specific cut-point for mortality at 1 and 7 years (HR = 2.6, 95% CI: 1.6-4.2, P < 0.001; HR = 1.8, 95% CI: 1.3-2.4, P < 0.001), with mortality of 22% versus 10% at 1 year ( P < 0.001) and 37% versus 27% at 7 years ( P < 0.001) in patients with RDW ≥14.5% versus those with RDW <14.5%. Conclusions RDW is an important prognostic factor in TAVR patients. A RDW level higher than 14.5% is significantly associated with post-TAVR early and late mortality. RDW levels should be incorporated into current risk assessment models as an additional variable to predict post-TAVR outcomes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (22) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eirini Apostolidou ◽  
Dhaval Kolte ◽  
Kevin F. Kennedy ◽  
Charles E. Beale ◽  
J. Dawn Abbott ◽  
...  

Background The relationship between local hospital culture and transfusion rates following endovascular and surgical cardiovascular procedures has not been well studied. Methods and Results Patients undergoing coronary revascularization, aortic valve replacement, lower extremity peripheral vascular intervention, or carotid artery revascularization from up to 852 US hospitals in the Nationwide Readmissions Database were identified. Crude and risk‐standardized red blood cell transfusion rates were determined for each procedure. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between respective procedural transfusion rates. Median odds ratios were estimated to reflect between‐hospital variability in red blood cell transfusion rates following the same procedure for a given patient. There was wide variation in red blood cell transfusion rates across different procedures, from 2% following carotid endarterectomy to 29% following surgical aortic valve replacement. For surgical and endovascular modalities, transfusion rates at the same hospital were highly correlated for aortic valve replacement ( r =0.67; P <0.001), moderately correlated for coronary revascularization ( r =0.56; P <0.001) and peripheral vascular intervention ( r =0.51; P <0.001), and weakly correlated for carotid artery revascularization ( r =0.19, P <0.001). Median odds ratios were all >2, highest for coronary artery bypass graft surgery and surgical aortic valve replacement, indicating substantial site variation in transfusion rates. Conclusions After adjustment for patient‐related factors, wide variation in red blood cell transfusion rates remained across surgical and endovascular procedures employed for the same cardiovascular condition. Transfusion rates following these procedures are highly correlated at individual hospitals and vary widely across hospitals. In aggregate, these findings suggest that local institutional culture significantly influences the decision to transfuse following invasive cardiovascular procedures and highlight the need for randomized data to inform such decisions.


2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Abdul Razzack ◽  
S Pothuru ◽  
S Mandava ◽  
S Adeel Hassan ◽  
K Theja Reddy ◽  
...  

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background-Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is associated with periprocedural bleeding , mainly driven by vascular complications leading to blood cell transfusion. Additionally, anemia is highly prevalent in this population. The decision regarding the necessity for blood transfusion in patients undergoing TAVR is challenging. Methods-Electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane) were searched from inception to December 16th, 2020. Unadjusted odds ratios (OR) were calculated from dichotomous data using Mantel Haenszel (M-H) random-effects with statistical significance to be considered if the confidence interval excludes 1 and p &lt; 0.05.The primary outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction(MI), Stroke(CVA), and acute kidney injury(AKI). Results- A total of six studies with 6701 participants (Transfusions = 1505, Non-Transfusions = 5196) were included in our analysis. Average follow-up duration was 30 days. Mean age was 82.4 and 81.5 in the Transfusions and Non-transfusions group respectively. RBC transfusion was associated with higher 30-day mortality (OR-4.08; 95%CI 2.29-7.27; p &lt; 0.00001; I2 = 77) as well as increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) (OR 2.97;95%CI 2.07-4.26; p &lt; 0.00001; I2 = 77) and stroke (OR 2.44; 95%CI 1.78- 3.34; p &lt; 0.00001,I2 = 0) However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of MI (OR 1.15;95%CI 0.50-2.64; p = 0.74,I2 = 0) Conclusion- RBC transfusion is a correlate and an independent predictor of all-cause mortality, acute kidney injury and stroke in this patient population and should be used with caution Abstract Figure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document