Exclusivity in concession revenue sharing contracts

2022 ◽  
Vol 99 ◽  
pp. 102158
Author(s):  
Adrián Nerja
Keyword(s):  
2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fouad H. Mirzaei ◽  
Fredrik Odegaard ◽  
Xinghao Yan

Author(s):  
Santiago Balseiro ◽  
Max Lin ◽  
Vahab Mirrokni ◽  
Renato Paes Leme ◽  
Song Zuo
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 363-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
RÖGNVALDUR HANNESSON
Keyword(s):  

1979 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 173-184
Author(s):  
RONALD C. FISHER

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 1309
Author(s):  
Jiali Qu ◽  
Benyong Hu ◽  
Chao Meng

In the retail industry, customer value has become the key to maintaining competitive advantages. In the era of new retail, customer value is not only affected by the product price, but it is also closely related to innovations, such as value-added services and unique business models. In this paper, we study the joint innovation investment and pricing decisions in a retailer–supplier supply chain based on revenue sharing contracts and customer value. We first find that, in the non-cooperative game, equilibrium only exists in the supplier Stackelberg game. However, revenue sharing contracts cannot coordinate the supply chain in the non-cooperative game. By considering supply chain members’ bargaining power, we find that there exists a unique equilibrium for the Nash bargaining product. In addition, revenue sharing contracts can coordinate the supply chain and achieve the optimal consumer surplus. When the supply chain is coordinated, supply chain profit is allocated to the supply chain members based on their bargaining powers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document