scholarly journals Patterns of Recurrence and Post-Recurrence Survival after Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 233 (5) ◽  
pp. S239
Author(s):  
Hordur M. Kolbeinsson ◽  
Allison Hoppe ◽  
Lindsey LeQuia ◽  
David Lawlor ◽  
M. Mura Assifi ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
J. de Vos-Geelen ◽  
S.M.E. Geurts ◽  
G.A.P. Nieuwenhuijzen ◽  
F.E.M. Voncken ◽  
J.A. Bogers ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 742-749 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias F. Haefner ◽  
Kristin Lang ◽  
David Krug ◽  
Stefan A. Koerber ◽  
Lorenz Uhlmann ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 118-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Somnath Mukherjee ◽  
Chris Hurt ◽  
Stephen Falk ◽  
Simon Gollins ◽  
John Staffurth ◽  
...  

118 Background: One of the largest trials in dCRT for localised oesophageal cancer, SCOPE 1 tested the role of adding cetuximab to conventional dCRT, and showed that this was associated with greater toxicity and worse survival. Here we present the long-term outcomes. Methods: Phase II/III trial. Randomisation: cisplatin 60mg/m2 D1 and capecitabine 625mg/m2 daily D1-21 for 4 cycles with/without Cetuximab 400mg/m2 D1 followed by 250mg/m2weekly. RT: 50Gy in 25 fractions given concurrent with cycles 3 and 4. Recruitment: Feb 2008 - Feb 2012, when the IDMC recommended trial closure on the basis of futility. Results: 258 patients (dCRT = 129; dCRT+C = 129) were recruited from 36 centres. Median follow-up (IQR): 46.7 (36.0-49.0) months for all surviving pts. 65.1% (dCRT arm) and 69.8% (dCRT+C arm) of patients had died. Esophageal cancer was the cause in 82.1% and 86.7% of deaths respectively (p = 0.41). Median OS months (95% CI) was 34.5 (24.7-42.3) in dCRT and 24.7 (18.6-31.3) in dCRT+C (HR 1.25, p = 0.137); corresponding 3-year OS (95% CI) was 47.2% (38.2%-55.7%) and 37.6% (29.1%-46.0%). Median PFS (95% CI): 24.1 (15.3-29.9) and 15.9 (10.7-20.8) months respectively (HR1.28, p = 0.114). There was some evidence that local PFS (within RT field) was lower in the dCRT+C arm (HR1.38, p = 0.051). On multivariable analysis including treatment arm, Stage I-II ds (vs Stage III), full-dose RT and higher cisplatin dose intensity ( ≥ 75% vs < 75%) were associated with improved OS and PFS. Patterns of recurrence (n [%]) were similar in both arms (see table). In dCRT arm, 31/38 pts (81.6%) with local relapse within the RT field compared to 40/48 (83.3%) in the dCRT+C arm (p = 0.8). Conclusions: The mature analysis shows unprecedented survival in dCRT arm, comparable to surgical trials (e.g. 3-year OS % [95% CIs] in OE05: CF 39 [35, 44] and ECX 42 [37, 46], in OE02: 31 [27, 36]). OS inferiority of dCRT+C is no longer statistically significant. The lower PFS (within RT field) in the dCRT+C arm was consistent with the lower number of patients receiving full dose of RT in the dCRT+C arm. Clinical trial information: 47718479. [Table: see text]


2010 ◽  
Vol 200 (4) ◽  
pp. 446-453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin K. Smit ◽  
Bareld B. Pultrum ◽  
Hendrik M. van Dullemen ◽  
Gooitzen M. Van Dam ◽  
Henk Groen ◽  
...  

Cancer ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 120 (14) ◽  
pp. 2099-2105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer A. Dorth ◽  
John A. Pura ◽  
Manisha Palta ◽  
Christopher G. Willett ◽  
Hope E. Uronis ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (13) ◽  
pp. 169-176
Author(s):  
Lisa M. Evangelista ◽  
James L. Coyle

Esophageal cancer is the sixth leading cause of death from cancer worldwide. Esophageal resection is the mainstay treatment for cancers of the esophagus. While curative, surgical resection may result in swallowing difficulties that require intervention from speech-language pathologists (SLPs). Minimally invasive surgical procedures for esophageal resection have aimed to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with more invasive techniques. Both intra-operative and post-operative complications, regardless of the surgical approach, can result in dysphagia. This article will review the epidemiological impact of esophageal cancers, operative complications resulting in dysphagia, and clinical assessment and management of dysphagia pertinent to esophageal resection.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document