Multivariate injury risk criteria and injury probability scores for fractures to the distal radius

2013 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 973-978 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy A. Burkhart ◽  
David M. Andrews ◽  
Cynthia E. Dunning
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anand Balu Nellippallil ◽  
Parker R. Berthelson ◽  
Luke Peterson ◽  
Raj Prabhu

1999 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 4-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Welch

Abstract Functional capacity evaluations (FCEs) have become an important component of disability evaluation during the past 10 years to assess an individual's ability to perform the essential or specific functions of a job, both preplacement and during rehabilitation. Evaluating both job performance and physical ability is a complex assessment, and some practitioners are not yet certain that an FCE can achieve these goals. An FCE is useful only if it predicts job performance, and factors that should be assessed include overall performance; consistency of performance across similar areas of the FCE; consistency between observed behaviors during the FCE and limitations or abilities reported by the worker; objective changes (eg, blood pressure and pulse) that are appropriate relative to performance; external factors (illness, lack of sleep, or medication); and a coefficient of variation that can be measured and assessed. FCEs can identify specific movement patterns or weaknesses; measure improvement during rehabilitation; identify a specific limitation that is amenable to accommodation; and identify a worker who appears to be providing a submaximal effort. FCEs are less reliable at predicting injury risk; they cannot tell us much about endurance over a time period longer than the time required for the FCE; and the FCE may measure simple muscular functions when the job requires more complex ones.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan T. Karazsia ◽  
Keri J. Brown Kirschman

2015 ◽  
Vol 04 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Masao Nishiwaki ◽  
Mark Welsh ◽  
Louis Ferreira ◽  
James Johnson ◽  
Graham King ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 22 (03) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Piñal ◽  
F García-Bernal ◽  
Julio Delgado ◽  
Marcos Sanmartín ◽  
Javier Regalado ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (8) ◽  

Introduction: The study compares the results of open reduction using volar locking plates with ligamentotaxis by external fixation in fractures of distal radius type 2R3C according to AO classification. Methods: A retrospective study evaluating the results of osteosynthesis in patients with distal radius fractures type 2R3C according to AO classification, operated until December 2018. The ORIF method with volar locking plates (LCP) was used in 54 patients, and closed reduction with ligamentotaxis using external fixation (EF) was used in 33 patients. The mean age of the patients was 46.7 years in the LCP group and 59.6 years in the EF group. All were evaluated for their X-ray and functional outcomes and according to the Green and O’Brien score at 6 and 12 months after surgery. Results: According to X-rays at 12 months in the LCP group, the mean sagittal tilt was 10.13°, the mean radial inclination was 23.89°, and the mean radial length was 11.84 mm. In the EF group, the mean sagittal tilt was 6.32°, the mean radial inclination was 24.78°, and the mean radial length was 9.89 mm. According to the Green and O’Brien score, we recorded a mean score of 84.44 points in the LCP group at 12 month; we achieved good and excellent results in 83.33% of the patients and no poor result was observed. In the EF group the final mean score was 77.27; good and excellent results were achieved in 45.46% of the patients and a poor result in one patient. Conclusion: Based on the results in our group of patients, the internal type osteosynthesis using LCP implants can be recommended as a first-choice technique in the treatment of 2R3C fractures according to AO classification.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document