Agreement between spatiotemporal parameters from a photoelectric system with different filter settings and high-speed video analysis during running on a treadmill at comfortable velocity

The biomechanics of walking and running, in both ground and treadmill conditions, have been extensively analysed and important differences have been reported. Despite some previous studies having examined the validity and reliability of the OptoGait™ system for measuring gait characteristics during walking, no previous works have determined the reliability and validity of this system while running on a treadmill. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the absolute reliability (within-subject variation) and evaluate the concurrent validity of the OptoGait™ system for measuring spatiotemporal variables while running at a comfortable speed by comparing data with a highly accurate system of measuring those parameters (i.e. video analysis at 1000 Hz). Forty-nine endurance runners performed a running protocol on a treadmill at a comfortable speed. Two systems were used to collect data: OptoGait™ system and high-speed video analysis at 1000 Hz. The coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated as a measure of absolute reliability. The OptoGait™ system reported a CV range between 2.2% and 11.4% for spatiotemporal parameters, while the video analysis showed a CV range between 0.02% and 9.9%. To determine concurrent validity, intra class correlation coefficients (ICC) and pairwise comparisons of means (t-test) were calculated between data from both systems. Although the paired t-test demonstrated significant differences between systems, a high level of agreement (ICC > 0.89) was obtained in spatiotemporal parameters between systems. When compared to a high-speed video analysis at 1000 Hz, the results indicate that the OptoGait™ system is a reliable and valid tool to measure spatiotemporal gait characteristics while running on a treadmill at a comfortable speed.

Download Full-text

Influence of RunScribe™ placement on the accuracy of spatiotemporal gait characteristics during running

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part P Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology ◽

10.1177/1754337119876513 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 234 (1) ◽

pp. 11-18 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Felipe García-Pinillos ◽

José M Chicano-Gutiérrez ◽

Emilio J Ruiz-Malagón ◽

Luis E Roche-Seruendo

Keyword(s):

Video Analysis ◽

Contact Time ◽

High Speed ◽

Intraclass Correlation ◽

Step Length ◽

Flight Time ◽

Systematic Bias ◽

Step Frequency ◽

High Speed Video ◽

Spatiotemporal Parameters

This study aimed to examine the influence of RunScribe location (i.e. lace shoe vs heel shoe) on the accuracy of spatiotemporal gait characteristics during running by comparing data with a high-speed video analysis system at 1000 Hz. A total of 49 endurance runners performed a running protocol on a treadmill at comfortable velocity. Two systems were used to determine spatiotemporal parameters (i.e. contact time, flight time, step frequency, and step length) during running: high-speed video analysis at 1000 Hz and two different RunScribe placements (i.e. lace shoe vs heel shoe). The pairwise comparisons showed some between-system differences in both lace shoe (contact time: p = 0.009; step frequency: p = 0.001) and heel shoe (flight time: p = 0.006; step frequency: p = 0.010), although the effect sizes were small (effect size < 0.3 in all cases). The intraclass correlation coefficients revealed an almost perfect association between systems for contact time and flight time (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.85–0.90), and step length and step frequency (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.96–0.97), regardless of the RunScribe placement. Bland–Altman plots revealed that the lace shoe location yielded smaller systematic bias, random errors, and narrower limits of agreement for spatiotemporal parameters during running, except for SF, which had a higher accuracy in a heel shoe location. The results suggest that RunScribe is a valid system to measure spatiotemporal parameters during running on a treadmill according to a high-speed video analysis at 1000 Hz. In addition, the data indicate that the location of the RunScribe system (lace shoe vs heel shoe) plays an important role on the accuracy of spatiotemporal parameters. The lace shoe placement showed smaller systematic bias, random errors, and narrower limits of agreement for contact time, flight time, and step length, whereas the heel shoe placement was slightly more accurate for the step frequency.

Download Full-text