Classification of runners’ performance levels with concurrent prediction of biomechanical parameters using data from inertial measurement units

2020 ◽  
Vol 112 ◽  
pp. 110072
Author(s):  
Qi Liu ◽  
Shiwei Mo ◽  
Vincent C.K. Cheung ◽  
Ben M.F. Cheung ◽  
Shuotong Wang ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Alejandro Melendez-Calderon ◽  
Camila Shirota ◽  
Sivakumar Balasubramanian

Inertial measurement units (IMUs) are increasingly used to estimate movement quality and quantity to the infer the nature of motor behavior. The current literature contains several attempts to estimate movement smoothness using data from IMUs, many of which assume that the translational and rotational kinematics measured by IMUs can be directly used with the smoothness measures spectral arc length (SPARC) and log dimensionless jerk (LDLJ-V). However, there has been no investigation of the validity of these approaches. In this paper, we systematically evaluate the use of these measures on the kinematics measured by IMUs. We show that: (a) SPARC and LDLJ-V are valid measures of smoothness only when used with velocity; (b) SPARC and LDLJ-V applied on translational velocity reconstructed from IMU is highly error prone due to drift caused by integration of reconstruction errors; (c) SPARC can be applied directly on rotational velocities measured by a gyroscope, but LDLJ-V can be error prone. For discrete translational movements, we propose a modified version of the LDLJ-V measure, which can be applied to acceleration data (LDLJ-A). We evaluate the performance of these measures using simulated and experimental data. We demonstrate that the accuracy of LDLJ-A depends on the time profile of IMU orientation reconstruction error. Finally, we provide recommendations for how to appropriately apply these measures in practice under different scenarios, and highlight various factors to be aware of when performing smoothness analysis using IMU data.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alejandro Melendez-Calderon ◽  
Camila Shirota ◽  
Sivakumar Balasubramanian

AbstractThere is an increasing trend in using inertial measurement units (IMUs) to estimate movement quality and quantity, and infer the nature of motor behavior. The current literature contains several attempts to estimate movement smoothness using data from IMUs, most of which assume that the translational and rotational kinematics measured by IMUs can be directly used with existing smoothness measures - spectral arc length (SPARC) and log dimensionless jerk (LDLJ-V). However, there has been no investigation of the validity of these approaches. In this paper, we systematically evaluate the appropriateness of the using these measures on the kinematics measured by an IMU. We show that: (a) current measures (SPARC and LDLJ-V) are inappropriate for translational movements; and (b) SPARC and LDLJ-V can be used rotational kinematics measured by an IMU. For discrete translational movements, we propose a modified version of the LDLJ-V measure, which can be applied to acceleration data (LDLJ-A), while roughly maintaining the properties of the original measure. However, accuracy of LDLJ-A depends on the IMU orientation estimation error. We evaluate the performance of these measures using simulated and experimental data. We then provide recommendations for how to appropriately apply these measures in practice, and the various factors to be aware of when performing smoothness analysis using IMU data.


2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 342-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin A. O’Reilly ◽  
Darragh F. Whelan ◽  
Tomas E. Ward ◽  
Eamonn Delahunt ◽  
Brian Caulfield

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann David ◽  
Tanya Subash ◽  
SKM Varadhan ◽  
Alejandro Melendez-Calderon ◽  
Sivakumar Balasubramanian

AbstractThe ultimate goal of any upper-limb neurorehabilitation procedure is to improve upper-limb functioning in daily life. While clinic-based assessments provide an assessment of what a patient can do, they do not completely reflect what a patient does in his/her daily life. The compensatory use of the less affected upper-limb (e.g. “learned non-use”) in daily life is a common behavioral pattern seen in patients with hemiparesis. To this end, there has been an increasing interest in the use of wearable sensors to objectively assess upper-limb functioning. This paper presents a framework for assessing upper-limb functioning using sensors by providing: (a) a set of definitions of important construct associated with upper-limb functioning; (b) presenting different visualization methods for evaluating upper-limb functioning, along ways to qualitatively analyze different visualization methods; and (c) two new measures for quantifying how much an upper-limb is used and the relative bias in the use of the two upper-limbs. The demonstration of some of these components is presented using data collected from inertial measurement units from a previous study. The proposed framework can help guide the future technical and clinical work in this area to realize a valid, objective, and robust tool for assessing upper-limb functioning. This will in turn drive the refinement and standardization of the assessment of upper-limb functioning.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann David ◽  
Tanya Subash ◽  
S. K. M. Varadhan ◽  
Alejandro Melendez-Calderon ◽  
Sivakumar Balasubramanian

The ultimate goal of any upper-limb neurorehabilitation procedure is to improve upper-limb functioning in daily life. While clinic-based assessments provide an assessment of what a patient can do, they do not completely reflect what a patient does in his/her daily life. The use of compensatory strategies such as the use of the less affected upper-limb or excessive use of trunk in daily life is a common behavioral pattern seen in patients with hemiparesis. To this end, there has been an increasing interest in the use of wearable sensors to objectively assess upper-limb functioning. This paper presents a framework for assessing upper-limb functioning using sensors by providing: (a) a set of definitions of important constructs associated with upper-limb functioning; (b) different visualization methods for evaluating upper-limb functioning; and (c) two new measures for quantifying how much an upper-limb is used and the relative bias in their use. The demonstration of some of these components is presented using data collected from inertial measurement units from a previous study. The proposed framework can help guide the future technical and clinical work in this area to realize valid, objective, and robust tools for assessing upper-limb functioning. This will in turn drive the refinement and standardization of the assessment of upper-limb functioning.


2017 ◽  
Vol 58 ◽  
pp. 155-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin A. O'Reilly ◽  
Darragh F. Whelan ◽  
Tomas E. Ward ◽  
Eamonn Delahunt ◽  
Brian M. Caulfield

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document