scholarly journals Deficiencies in Provider-Reported Interpreter Use in a Clinical Trial Comparing Telephonic and Video Interpretation in a Pediatric Emergency Department

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (10) ◽  
pp. 573-580
Author(s):  
Colleen K. Gutman ◽  
Eileen J. Klein ◽  
Kristin Follmer ◽  
Julie C. Brown ◽  
Beth E. Ebel ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Rossi ◽  
Silvano Junior Santini ◽  
Daniela Di Genova ◽  
Gianpaolo Maggi ◽  
Alberto Verrotti ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Social robots (SRs) have been used for improving anxiety in children in stressful clinical situations, such as during painful procedures. However, no studies have yet been performed to assess their effect in children while waiting for emergency room consultations. OBJECTIVE This study aims to assess the impact of SRs on managing stress in children waiting for an emergency room procedure through the assessment of salivary cortisol levels. METHODS This was an open randomized clinical trial in children attending a pediatric emergency department. Children accessing the emergency room were randomized to 1 of 3 groups: (1) playing with a NAO SR, (2) playing with a study nurse, or (3) waiting with parents. The salivary cortisol levels of all children were measured through a swab. Salivary cortisol levels before and after the intervention were compared in the 3 groups. We calculated the effect size of our interventions through the Cohen <i>d</i>-based effect size correlation (<i>r</i>). RESULTS A total of 109 children aged 3-10 years were enrolled in the study, and 94 (86.2%) had complete data for the analyses. Salivary cortisol levels significantly decreased more in the group exposed to robot interaction than in the other two groups (<i>r</i>=0.75). Cortisol levels decreased more in girls (<i>r</i>=0.92) than in boys (<i>r</i>=0.57). CONCLUSIONS SRs are efficacious in decreasing stress in children accessing the emergency room and may be considered a tool for improving emotional perceptions of children and their families in such a critical setting. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04627909; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT04627909


PEDIATRICS ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 147 (2) ◽  
pp. e20193312
Author(s):  
K. Casey Lion ◽  
Jesse Gritton ◽  
Jack Scannell ◽  
Julie C. Brown ◽  
Beth E. Ebel ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 671-680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yizhao Ni ◽  
Andrew F Beck ◽  
Regina Taylor ◽  
Jenna Dyas ◽  
Imre Solti ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective (1) To develop an automated algorithm to predict a patient’s response (ie, if the patient agrees or declines) before he/she is approached for a clinical trial invitation; (2) to assess the algorithm performance and the predictors on real-world patient recruitment data for a diverse set of clinical trials in a pediatric emergency department; and (3) to identify directions for future studies in predicting patients’ participation response. Materials and Methods We collected 3345 patients’ response to trial invitations on 18 clinical trials at one center that were actively enrolling patients between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2012. In parallel, we retrospectively extracted demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical predictors from multiple sources to represent the patients’ profiles. Leveraging machine learning methodology, the automated algorithms predicted participation response for individual patients and identified influential features associated with their decision-making. The performance was validated on the collection of actual patient response, where precision, recall, F-measure, and area under the ROC curve were assessed. Results Compared to the random response predictor that simulated the current practice, the machine learning algorithms achieved significantly better performance (Precision/Recall/F-measure/area under the ROC curve: 70.82%/92.02%/80.04%/72.78% on 10-fold cross validation and 71.52%/92.68%/80.74%/75.74% on the test set). By analyzing the significant features output by the algorithms, the study confirmed several literature findings and identified challenges that could be mitigated to optimize recruitment. Conclusion By exploiting predictive variables from multiple sources, we demonstrated that machine learning algorithms have great potential in improving the effectiveness of the recruitment process by automatically predicting patients’ participation response to trial invitations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document