Controversy and Debate Series on Core Outcome Sets. Paper 4: Debate on Paper 1 from the perspective of COMET [Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials]

2020 ◽  
Vol 125 ◽  
pp. 222-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula R. Williamson ◽  
Jane M. Blazeby ◽  
Sara T. Brookes ◽  
Mike Clarke ◽  
Caroline B. Terwee ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stergios D Doumouchtsis ◽  
Vivek Nama ◽  
Gabriele Falconi ◽  
Maria Patricia Rada ◽  
Jittima Manonai ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Studies evaluating cosmetic gynecological interventions have followed variable methodology and reported a diversity of outcomes. Such variations limit the comparability of studies and the value of research-based evidence. The development of core outcome sets (COS) and core outcome measures sets (COMS) would help address these issues, ensuring outcomes important to all stakeholders, primarily women requesting or with experience of cosmetic gynecological interventions. OBJECTIVE N/A METHODS An international steering group, within the CHORUS Collaboration, including healthcare professionals, researchers and women with experience in cosmetic gynecological interventions will guide the development of COS and COMS. Potential outcome measures and outcomes will be identified through comprehensive literature reviews. COS and COMS will be entered into an international, multi-perspective online Delphi survey. The Delphi survey results will be evaluated in subsequent stakeholder group consensus meetings in the process of establishing ‘core’ outcomes. RESULTS Dissemination and implementation of the resulting COS and COMS within an international context will be promoted and reviewed. CONCLUSIONS Embedding the COS and COMS for cosmetic gynecological interventions within future clinical trials, systematic reviews, and practice guidelines could contribute to the enhancement of the value of research and improving overall patient care. CLINICALTRIAL Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials [COMET] initiative, registration number 1592


Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Simen Vergote ◽  
Felix De Bie ◽  
Jan Bosteels ◽  
Holly Hedrick ◽  
James Duffy ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is, depending of the severity, a birth defect associated with significant mortality and morbidity. Prenatal screening by ultrasound may detect this condition and comprehensive assessment of severity is possible, allowing for in utero referral to an experienced centre for planned delivery. In an effort to improve outcomes, prenatal interventions to stimulate lung development were proposed. Along the same lines, new postnatal management strategies are being developed. In order to enable proper comparison of novel perinatal interventions as well as outcomes, a set of uniform and relevant outcome measures is required. Core outcome sets (COS) are agreed, clearly defined sets of outcomes to be measured in a standardised manner and reported consistently. Herein we aim to describe the methodology we will use to define a COS for perinatal and neonatal outcomes of foetuses and newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia and to draft a dissemination and implementation plan. Methods We will use the methodology described in the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) Initiative Handbook. An international steering group will be created to guide the development of the COS. We are systematically reviewing the literature to identify all potential relevant pre- and neonatal outcomes previously used in studies on perinatal interventions for CDH. We will build a consensus on these core outcomes in a stakeholder group using the Delphi method. After completion, a stakeholder meeting will decide on a final COS, using a modified Nominal Group Technique. Thereafter, we will review potential definitions and measurements of these outcomes, and again a consensus meeting will be organised, to finalise the COS before dissemination. Discussion We have started a procedure to develop a COS for studies on perinatal interventions for congenital diaphragmatic hernia, with the purpose of improving the quality of research, guide clinical practice and improve patient care and eventual use in future clinical trials, systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines. Trial registration We prospectively registered this study in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (registration number: CRD42019124399) and The Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) Initiative (registration number:1296).


10.2196/28032 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stergios D Doumouchtsis ◽  
Vivek Nama ◽  
Gabriele Falconi ◽  
Maria Patricia Rada ◽  
Jittima Manonai ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Murad Alam ◽  
Sarah A. Ibrahim ◽  
Bianca Y. Kang ◽  
Arianna F. Yanes ◽  
Bharat B. Mittal ◽  
...  

Trials ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula R Williamson ◽  
Doug G Altman ◽  
Jane M Blazeby ◽  
Mike Clarke ◽  
Elizabeth Gargon

Trials ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (S2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Williamson ◽  
Douglas Altman ◽  
Jane Blazeby ◽  
Michael Clarke ◽  
Elizabeth Gargon ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document