scholarly journals Study protocol: a core outcome set for perinatal interventions for congenital diaphragmatic hernia

Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Simen Vergote ◽  
Felix De Bie ◽  
Jan Bosteels ◽  
Holly Hedrick ◽  
James Duffy ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is, depending of the severity, a birth defect associated with significant mortality and morbidity. Prenatal screening by ultrasound may detect this condition and comprehensive assessment of severity is possible, allowing for in utero referral to an experienced centre for planned delivery. In an effort to improve outcomes, prenatal interventions to stimulate lung development were proposed. Along the same lines, new postnatal management strategies are being developed. In order to enable proper comparison of novel perinatal interventions as well as outcomes, a set of uniform and relevant outcome measures is required. Core outcome sets (COS) are agreed, clearly defined sets of outcomes to be measured in a standardised manner and reported consistently. Herein we aim to describe the methodology we will use to define a COS for perinatal and neonatal outcomes of foetuses and newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia and to draft a dissemination and implementation plan. Methods We will use the methodology described in the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) Initiative Handbook. An international steering group will be created to guide the development of the COS. We are systematically reviewing the literature to identify all potential relevant pre- and neonatal outcomes previously used in studies on perinatal interventions for CDH. We will build a consensus on these core outcomes in a stakeholder group using the Delphi method. After completion, a stakeholder meeting will decide on a final COS, using a modified Nominal Group Technique. Thereafter, we will review potential definitions and measurements of these outcomes, and again a consensus meeting will be organised, to finalise the COS before dissemination. Discussion We have started a procedure to develop a COS for studies on perinatal interventions for congenital diaphragmatic hernia, with the purpose of improving the quality of research, guide clinical practice and improve patient care and eventual use in future clinical trials, systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines. Trial registration We prospectively registered this study in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (registration number: CRD42019124399) and The Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) Initiative (registration number:1296).

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Lozano-Álvarez ◽  
Daniel Pérez-Prieto ◽  
Guillem Saló ◽  
Antoni Molina ◽  
Andreu Lladó ◽  
...  

Introduction. Outcome evaluation is an important aspect of the treatment of patients with degenerative lumbar disease. We evaluated the usefulness of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) in assessing people affected by degenerative lumbar disease in daily clinical practice.Methods. We evaluated 221 patients who had completed preoperatively and 2 years after surgery VAS pain, Short Form-36 (SF-36), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and COMI. We calculated the change of scores and its sensitivity to change. The internal consistency of the COMI items and the correlation between the COMI scores and the scores of the other measurements were assessed.Results. Statistically significant differences were observed between the mean scores of the preoperative and 2 years questionnaires for nearly all measurements. COMI showed a good internal consistency, except for the preoperative pain subscale. The sensitivity to change was high for the total COMI and its pain and well-being subscales and moderate for the rest. The COMI demonstrated strong correlation with the other measurements.Conclusions. The COMI is a useful tool for assessing the patient-based outcome in the studied population. Given its simplicity, good correlation with the SF-36 and ODI and its good sensitivity to change, it could replace more cumbersome instruments in daily clinical practice.


2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (S3) ◽  
pp. 367-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne F. Mannion ◽  
F. Porchet ◽  
F. S. Kleinstück ◽  
F. Lattig ◽  
D. Jeszenszky ◽  
...  

Trials ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (S2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Williamson ◽  
Douglas Altman ◽  
Jane Blazeby ◽  
Michael Clarke ◽  
Elizabeth Gargon ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 186-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gul Oznur Karabicak ◽  
Zeynep Hazar Kanik ◽  
Gurkan Gunaydin ◽  
Omer Osman Pala ◽  
Seyit Citaker

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. S136
Author(s):  
Francois Porchet ◽  
Sina Finkenstaedt ◽  
Hans-Juergen Becker ◽  
Anne F. Mannion

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 863-872 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Monticone ◽  
Simona Ferrante ◽  
Serena Maggioni ◽  
Gisel Grenat ◽  
Giovanni A. Checchia ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document