scholarly journals The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative

Trials ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula R Williamson ◽  
Doug G Altman ◽  
Jane M Blazeby ◽  
Mike Clarke ◽  
Elizabeth Gargon
2020 ◽  
Vol 125 ◽  
pp. 222-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula R. Williamson ◽  
Jane M. Blazeby ◽  
Sara T. Brookes ◽  
Mike Clarke ◽  
Caroline B. Terwee ◽  
...  

Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Simen Vergote ◽  
Felix De Bie ◽  
Jan Bosteels ◽  
Holly Hedrick ◽  
James Duffy ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is, depending of the severity, a birth defect associated with significant mortality and morbidity. Prenatal screening by ultrasound may detect this condition and comprehensive assessment of severity is possible, allowing for in utero referral to an experienced centre for planned delivery. In an effort to improve outcomes, prenatal interventions to stimulate lung development were proposed. Along the same lines, new postnatal management strategies are being developed. In order to enable proper comparison of novel perinatal interventions as well as outcomes, a set of uniform and relevant outcome measures is required. Core outcome sets (COS) are agreed, clearly defined sets of outcomes to be measured in a standardised manner and reported consistently. Herein we aim to describe the methodology we will use to define a COS for perinatal and neonatal outcomes of foetuses and newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia and to draft a dissemination and implementation plan. Methods We will use the methodology described in the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) Initiative Handbook. An international steering group will be created to guide the development of the COS. We are systematically reviewing the literature to identify all potential relevant pre- and neonatal outcomes previously used in studies on perinatal interventions for CDH. We will build a consensus on these core outcomes in a stakeholder group using the Delphi method. After completion, a stakeholder meeting will decide on a final COS, using a modified Nominal Group Technique. Thereafter, we will review potential definitions and measurements of these outcomes, and again a consensus meeting will be organised, to finalise the COS before dissemination. Discussion We have started a procedure to develop a COS for studies on perinatal interventions for congenital diaphragmatic hernia, with the purpose of improving the quality of research, guide clinical practice and improve patient care and eventual use in future clinical trials, systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines. Trial registration We prospectively registered this study in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (registration number: CRD42019124399) and The Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) Initiative (registration number:1296).


Trials ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (S2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Williamson ◽  
Douglas Altman ◽  
Jane Blazeby ◽  
Michael Clarke ◽  
Elizabeth Gargon ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. e050231
Author(s):  
Cheow Peng Ooi ◽  
Abdul Hanif Khan Yusof Khan ◽  
Rosliza Abdul Manaf ◽  
Norlaila Mustafa ◽  
Norlela Sukor ◽  
...  

AbstractIntroductionThyroid dysfunctions (TD) are common medical conditions affecting all global populations. Improved healthcare leading to increasing survival rates and delayed diagnosis rendered significant burden of the disease in the increasing number of patients with TD with comorbid illnesses. Therefore, reducing the burden of TD and improving the quality of care are crucial. Existing poor-quality data that guide evidence-based decisions only provide a fragmented picture of clinical care. The different outcomes across studies assessing the effectiveness of treatments impede our ability to synthesise results for determining the most efficient treatments. This project aims to produce a core outcome set (COS), which embeds the multiple complex dimensions of routine clinical care for the effectiveness studies and clinical care of adult patients with TD.Methods and analysisThis mixed-method project has two phases. In phase 1, we will identify a list of patient-reported and clinical outcomes through qualitative research and systematic reviews. In phase 2, we will categorise the identified outcomes using the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials taxonomy of core domains and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. We will develop questionnaires from the list of outcomes identified from each domain for the two-round online Delphi exercise, aiming to reach a consensus on the COS. The Delphi process will include patients, carers, researchers and healthcare participants. We will hold an online consensus meeting involving representatives of all key stakeholders to establish the final COS.Ethics and disseminationThe study has been reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee for Research Involving Human Subjects, Universiti Putra Malaysia and the Research Ethics Committee, National University of Malaysia. This proposed COS in TD will improve the value of data, facilitate high-quality evidence synthesis and evidence-based decision-making. Furthermore, we will present the results to participants, in peer-reviewed academic journals and conferences.Registration detailsCore Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) Initiative database registration: http://www.comet-initiative.org/studies/details/1371


Pain ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 153 (12) ◽  
pp. 2315-2324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra D. Comer ◽  
James P. Zacny ◽  
Robert H. Dworkin ◽  
Dennis C. Turk ◽  
George E. Bigelow ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document