Incidence, possible risk factors, and potential effects of an opaque bubble layer created by a femtosecond laser

2008 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 417-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor Kaiserman ◽  
Hillel S. Maresky ◽  
Irit Bahar ◽  
David S. Rootman
2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (3) ◽  
pp. 91
Author(s):  
MarwaA Karim ◽  
AhmedS Abdel-Wanes ◽  
AbelrahmanG Salman ◽  
AzzaM.A Said ◽  
BasemF.A Riad

2019 ◽  
Vol 87 (12) ◽  
pp. 5031-5040
Author(s):  
AHMED S. ABDEL WANES, M.Sc.; ABDELRAHMAN G. SALMAN, M.D. ◽  
AZZA M.A. SAID, M.D.; BASSEM F.A. RIAD, M.D.

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (9) ◽  
pp. 608-612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Romain Courtin ◽  
Alain Saad ◽  
Emmanuel Guilbert ◽  
Alice Grise-Dulac ◽  
Damien Gatinel

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 178-182
Author(s):  
Hung-Yuan Lin ◽  
Yi-Ting Fang ◽  
Ya-Jung Chuang ◽  
Han-Chieh Yu ◽  
Christy Pu ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amr Mounir ◽  
Mahmoud Mohamed Farouk ◽  
Marwa Mahmoud Abdellah ◽  
Engy Mohamed Mostafa

Purpose. To evaluate the prevalence, possible risk factors, and clinical results of femtosecond laser implanted intrastromal corneal ring segment (ICRS) extrusion in keratoconic eyes. Patients and Methods. This is a retrospective observational study evaluating 333 eyes of 269 patients who were subjected to femtosecond laser-implanted Keraring ICRS in the Sohag Refractive Center, Sohag, Egypt, from January 2014 to January 2019. The study included eyes with channels created by a femtosecond laser (60 kHz IntraLase femtosecond system; Advanced Medical Optics, Santa Ana, California, USA) with implantation of Keraring intrastromal corneal ring segments (Mediphacos, Belo Horizonte, Brazil). Patient data and causes of Keraring extrusions were identified as being those rings that migrated or showed melting of the cornea with no other reason which required segment removal. Results. Seven eyes were found to fit the criteria of ring extrusion (2.1%) out of the 333 eyes which had Keraring implantation. All extruded rings were from patients with keratoconus grade 3, with eccentric cones, and with femtosecond creation of the tunnel. Four eyes belonging to 3 patients (57.1%) had a history of vernal Keratoconjunctivitis, yet they did not show signs of activity at the time of implantation. They reported excessive rubbing just before they presented with conjunctival hyperemia and foreign body sensation. Five eyes (71.4%) showed chronic sun exposure. The mean minimal corneal thickness was 401.85 μm (range 384–420 μm), while the mean maximum keratometry was 61 D (range 55.18–68.96 D). Most of the extruded rings had large arcs. Six eyes had crosslinking (CXL) at the same session of the Keraring implantation. The simultaneous CXL treatment is considered as a possible significant risk factor for ring extrusion. Conclusion. ICRS is an effective reversible option for patients with keratoconus who are intolerant to hard contact lenses, yet the choice of cases and ring segments is mandatory for satisfactory results. Moreover, meticulous history taking and examination reduces the incidence of complications including extrusion.


2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 635-641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonardo Mastropasqua ◽  
Roberta Calienno ◽  
Manuela Lanzini ◽  
Niccolò Salgari ◽  
Sergio De Vecchi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document