scholarly journals Comparative Study of Risk Factors for Opaque Bubble Layer Formation in Femtosecond-Laser Assisted LASIK

2019 ◽  
Vol 87 (12) ◽  
pp. 5031-5040
Author(s):  
AHMED S. ABDEL WANES, M.Sc.; ABDELRAHMAN G. SALMAN, M.D. ◽  
AZZA M.A. SAID, M.D.; BASSEM F.A. RIAD, M.D.
2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 178-182
Author(s):  
Hung-Yuan Lin ◽  
Yi-Ting Fang ◽  
Ya-Jung Chuang ◽  
Han-Chieh Yu ◽  
Christy Pu ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 417-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor Kaiserman ◽  
Hillel S. Maresky ◽  
Irit Bahar ◽  
David S. Rootman

2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (3) ◽  
pp. 91
Author(s):  
MarwaA Karim ◽  
AhmedS Abdel-Wanes ◽  
AbelrahmanG Salman ◽  
AzzaM.A Said ◽  
BasemF.A Riad

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (9) ◽  
pp. 584-590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ningling Wu ◽  
Joseph G. Christenbury ◽  
Jon G. Dishler ◽  
Tahir Kansu Bozkurt ◽  
Daniel Duel ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (9) ◽  
pp. 583-589
Author(s):  
Dong Hui Lim ◽  
Joo Hyun ◽  
Eunhae Shin ◽  
Byung-woo Ko ◽  
Eui-Sang Chung ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (9) ◽  
pp. 608-612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Romain Courtin ◽  
Alain Saad ◽  
Emmanuel Guilbert ◽  
Alice Grise-Dulac ◽  
Damien Gatinel

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Tognetto ◽  
Chiara De Giacinto ◽  
Alberto Armando Perrotta ◽  
Tommaso Candian ◽  
Alessandro Bova ◽  
...  

Purpose. To compare the capsule edges ultrastructure obtained by two femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) platforms and manual continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (CCC) using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Setting. Eye Clinic, University of Trieste, Italy. Design. Experimental comparative study. Methods. 150 anterior capsules were collected and divided into three groups as follows: Group 1 (50 capsules) obtained with manual CCC, Groups 2 and 3 (each with 50 capsules) obtained with the Catalys Laser and the LenSx Laser, respectively. All samples were imaged by means of SEM and regularity of the cut surface, and thickness of the capsule edge were evaluated and compared. Results. All femtosecond laser (FSL) capsules were perfectly circular, whereas some alteration of the circular shape was observed in the manual ones. Group 1 showed a smooth and regular capsule edge without any surface irregularity, conversely Groups 2 and 3 showed postage-stamp perforations on the capsule edge. The cut surface irregularity value in Group 2 was 1.4 ± 0.63, while it was 0.7 ± 0.49 in Group 3 (p<0.05). Group 1 had a significantly lower thickness of the capsule edge than the FSL groups (p<0.05). No statistically significant difference in the capsule edge thickness between the FSL groups was found (p=0.244). Conclusions. Despite the presence of slight cut surface irregularities, both FSL capsulotomies showed a better geometry and circularity than the manual ones. Capsulotomy specimens obtained using both FSL capsulotomies showed laser-induced alterations of the capsule edge when compared with smooth and regular edges obtained using manual CCC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document