AbstractFollowing active muscle stretch, a muscle’s force capacity is increased, which is known as residual force enhancement (rFE). As earlier studies found modulations of cortical excitability in the presence of rFE, this study aimed to test whether corticospinal drive contributes to rFE. Fourteen participants performed submaximal plantar flexion stretch-hold and fixed-end contractions at 30% of their maximal voluntary soleus muscle activity in a dynamometer. During the steady state of the contractions, participants either received subthreshold or suprathreshold transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of their motor cortex while triceps surae muscle responses to stimulation were obtained by electromyography (EMG) and net plantar flexion torque was recorded. B-mode ultrasound imaging was used to confirm muscle stretch during stretch-hold contractions in a subset of participants. Following stretch of the plantar flexors, an average rFE of 7% and 11% was observed for contractions with subthreshold and suprathreshold TMS, respectively. 41-46 milliseconds following subthreshold TMS, triceps surae muscle activity was suppressed by 19-25%, but no difference in suppression was found between contraction conditions. Similarly, the reduction in plantar flexion torque following subthreshold TMS was not different between contraction conditions. Motor evoked potentials, silent periods and superimposed twitches following suprathreshold stimulations were also not different between contraction conditions. As stimulations of the motor cortex by TMS did not result in any differences between stretch-hold and fixed-end contractions, we conclude that corticospinal drive does not contribute to the increased torque production in the presence of rFE following active muscle stretch.New & NoteworthyThis study tested whether corticospinal drive contributes to the increased torque capacity in the presence of rFE. Through subthreshold and suprathreshold TMS of the motor cortex, triceps surae muscle activity was respectively supressed or increased in the presence of rFE and during a reference contraction without rFE. As similar responses were observed between contraction contractions, we conclude that corticospinal drive likely does not contribute to the increased torque capacity in the presence of rFE.