Central venous access into the left superior vena cava

2006 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 433-434
Author(s):  
Klementyna M. Breyer ◽  
Brian J. Levine
Keyword(s):  
Superior Vena Cava ◽  
Superior Vena ◽  
Central Venous Access ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Left Superior Vena Cava

scholarly journals PERSISTENT LEFT SUPERIOR VENA CAVA IDENTIFIED DURING CENTRAL VENOUS ACCESS

CHEST Journal ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 160 (4) ◽  
pp. A927
Author(s):  
Huda Asif ◽  
Stanislav Ivanov ◽  
Arsalan Wappi ◽  
Katherine Hodgin ◽  
Adam Friedlander ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Superior Vena Cava ◽  
Superior Vena ◽  
Central Venous Access ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Left Superior Vena Cava ◽  
Persistent Left Superior Vena

scholarly journals Incidental Detection of Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava during Transvenous Pacing

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 52-54
Author(s):  
S Subash ◽  
Divya Gopal ◽  
Ashwini Thimmarayappa
Keyword(s):  
Superior Vena Cava ◽  
Superior Vena ◽  
Central Venous Access ◽  
Pacemaker Implantation ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
Left Superior Vena Cava ◽  
Persistent Left Superior Vena ◽  
Pacing Lead ◽  
Chest X Ray

ABSTRACT Patients with persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) are usually asymptomatic, but due to its anatomical defects, difficulties in establishing central venous access, pacemaker implantation and cardiothoracic surgery are common. We report a case of 65 years old patient who presented with complete heart block in cardiac critical care and, after emergency transvenous pacing, the chest X-ray showed unusual course of the transvenous pacing lead, which on further transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) evaluation demonstrated dilated coronary sinus with PLSVC. How to cite this article Subash S, Gopal D, Thimmarayappa A. Incidental Detection of Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava during Transvenous Pacing. J Perioper Echocardiogr 2015; 3(2):52-54.

scholarly journals Isolated Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava, Sick Sinus Syndrome, and Challenging Pacemaker Implantation

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Hatice S. Kemal ◽  
Aziz Gunsel ◽  
Levent Cerit ◽  
Murat Kocaoglu ◽  
Hamza Duygu
Keyword(s):  
Superior Vena Cava ◽  
Sick Sinus Syndrome ◽  
Superior Vena ◽  
Central Venous Access ◽  
Pacemaker Implantation ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
Left Superior Vena Cava ◽  
Persistent Left Superior Vena ◽  
Conduction Disturbances

Persistent left superior vena cava with absent right superior vena cava is a very rare venous anomaly and is known as isolated PLSVC. It is usually an asymptomatic anomaly and is mostly detected during difficult central venous access or pacemaker implantation, though it could also be associated with an increased incidence of congenital heart disease, arrhythmias, and conduction disturbances. Herein, we describe a dual-chamber pacemaker implantation in a patient with isolated PLSVC and sick sinus syndrome.

Sharp Recanalization of a Chronically Occluded Superior Vena Cava in a Patient with Multiple Prior Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 21-26
Author(s):  
Omar Shwaiki ◽  
Sarah Khoncarly ◽  
James J. Buchino ◽  
Janice McDaniel
Keyword(s):  
Superior Vena Cava ◽  
Superior Vena ◽  
Central Venous Access ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
Collateral Flow ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters ◽  
Sharp Recanalization ◽  
Central Catheters

Highlights Recurrent central venous access can lead to central venous occlusions. Collateral flow can be used adventitiously for PICC tip placement. Sharp recanalization can be used to reconstitute patency of an occluded SVC.

scholarly journals Superior Vena Cava Duplication: The Red Herring of Central Line Placement

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Karin Gunther ◽  
Carmen Lam ◽  
David Siegel
Keyword(s):  
Superior Vena Cava ◽  
Superior Vena ◽  
Central Venous Access ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
The United States ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Central Venous Access Lines

5 million central venous access lines are placed every year in the United States, and it is a common surgical bedside procedure. We present a case of a central venous catheter placement with port for chemotherapy use, during which a duplication of a superior vena cava was discovered on CTA chest after fluoroscopy could not confirm placement of the guidewire. Due to its potential clinical implications, superior vena cava duplication must be recognized when it occurs.

Placement of Central Venous Catheters in Patients Undergoing Major Maxillofacial Surgery - A Retrospective Clinical Audit

2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-131
Author(s):  
Vasileios Zochios ◽  
Michael Gilhooly ◽  
Simon Fenner
Keyword(s):  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Superior Vena Cava ◽  
Superior Vena ◽  
Central Venous Access ◽  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
Central Venous Catheters ◽  
Central Venous

Purpose The subclavian vein is thought to be the most appropriate route for central venous access in major maxillofacial surgery. Evidence suggests that left-sided central venous catheters should lie below the carina and be angulated at less than 40° to superior vena cava wall. This reduces perforation risk. With this in mind we audited our current practice for placement of central venous catheters for major maxillofacial surgery. The criteria against which we compared our practice were: 1) all catheter tips should lie below the carina and 2) the angle of the distal 1 cm of the catheter should be no more than 40° to the superior vena cava wall. Methods Left subclavian central venous catheters placed on a weekly operating list between September 2005 and August 2008 were identified retrospectively: 83 patients were identified; 22 were excluded. The angle of the central venous catheter tip and distance from the carina were measured on the first post-procedure chest-X ray. All central venous catheters used were 16 cm long. Results 82% of the catheter tips were located above the carina while 61% were angulated at greater than 40°; 11% of central venous catheters met both standards; 14% of central venous catheters placed by a consultant and 12% of catheters placed by a trainee met both standards. Conclusions 89% of the central venous catheters were not correctly placed. The majority of central venous catheter tips above the carina were at an adverse angle to the superior vena cava wall. We suggest that for left subclavian central lines, 20 cm catheters be used.

Successful Hemodialysis Through Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava: a Case Report

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 177-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priti Meena ◽  
Vinant Bhargava ◽  
Anurag Gupta ◽  
Apurva Srivastava ◽  
Lovy Gaur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Superior Vena Cava ◽  
Superior Vena ◽  
Central Venous Access ◽  
Pacemaker Implantation ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
Left Superior Vena Cava ◽  
Persistent Left Superior Vena ◽  
Hemodialysis Catheter ◽  
Radiologic Findings

Abstract Persistent left superior vena cava is an extremely rare venous anomaly affecting 0.5% to 2% of the general population. Persistent left superior vena cava with absent right superior vena cava, also termed as “isolated persistent left superior vena cava.” Persistent left superior vena cava, without associated cardiac anomalies, is usually innocuous. Its discovery, however, has important clinical implications. It can pose clinical difficulties with central venous access, hemodialysis catheter placement, and pacemaker implantation. We hereby present a case of persistent left superior vena cava that was incidentally encountered after the placement of a hemodialysis catheter through the left internal jugular vein. This case highlights the pertinent radiologic findings and emphasizes the importance of familiarity to such an anatomic anomaly.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document