Ethnopharmacology, food production, nutrition and biodiversity conservation: Towards a sustainable future for indigenous peoples

2011 ◽  
Vol 137 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vernon H. Heywood
2018 ◽  
Vol 227 ◽  
pp. 403-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colleen Corrigan ◽  
Heather Bingham ◽  
Yichuan Shi ◽  
Edward Lewis ◽  
Alienor Chauvenet ◽  
...  

FACETS ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 839-869
Author(s):  
◽  
Albert Marshall ◽  
Karen F. Beazley ◽  
Jessica Hum ◽  
shalan joudry ◽  
...  

Precipitous declines in biodiversity threaten planetary boundaries, requiring transformative changes to conservation. Colonial systems have decimated species and ecosystems and dispossessed Indigenous Peoples of their rights, territories, and livelihoods. Despite these challenges, Indigenous-governed lands retain a large proportion of biodiversity-rich landscapes. Indigenous Peoples have stewarded the land in ways that support people and nature in respectful relationship. Biodiversity conservation and resurgence of Indigenous autonomies are mutually compatible aims. To work towards these aims requires significant transformation in conservation and re-Indigenization. Key to both are systems that value people and nature in all their diversity and relationships. This paper introduces Indigenous principles for re-Indigenizing conservation: ( i) embracing Indigenous worldviews of ecologies and M’sɨt No’kmaq, ( ii) learning from Indigenous languages of the land, ( iii) Natural laws and Netukulimk, ( iv) correct relationships, ( v) total reflection and truth, ( vi) Etuaptmumk—“two-eyed seeing,” and “strong like two people”, and ( vii) “story-telling/story-listening”. Although the principles derive primarily from a Mi’kmaw worldview, many are common to diverse Indigenous ways of knowing. Achieving the massive effort required for biodiversity conservation in Canada will entail transformations in worldviews and ways of thinking and bold, proactive actions, not solely as means but as ongoing imperatives.


Land ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 704
Author(s):  
Jianqiao Zhao ◽  
Yue Cao ◽  
Le Yu ◽  
Xiaoxuan Liu ◽  
Yichuan Shi ◽  
...  

Biodiversity conservation is the cornerstone for sustainable development. Bold conservation targets provide the last opportunities to halt the human-driven mass extinction. Recently, bold conservation targets have been proposed to protect 30% or 50% of Earth. However, little is known about its potential impacts on cropland. We identify potential cropland losses when 30% and 50% of global terrestrial area is given back to nature by 2030/2050, at three spatial scales (global, biome and country) and using two approaches (“nature-only landscapes” and “shared landscapes”). We find that different targets, applied scales and approaches will lead to different cropland losses: (1) At the global scale, it is possible to protect 50% of the Earth while having minimum cropland losses. (2) At biome scale, 0.64% and 8.54% cropland will be lost globally in 2030 and 2050 under the nature-only approach while by contrast, the shared approach substantially reduces the number of countries confronted by cropland losses, demanding only 0% and 2.59% of global cropland losses in 2030 and 2050. (3) At the national scale, the nature-only approach causes losses of 3.58% and 10.73% of global cropland in 2030 and 2050, while the shared approach requires 0.77% and 7.55% cropland in 2030 and 2050. Our results indicate that bold conservation targets could be considered, especially when adopting the shared approach, and we suggest adopting ambitious targets (protecting at least 30% by 2030) at the UN Biodiversity Conference (COP 15) to ensure a sustainable future for Earth.


2011 ◽  
Vol 108 (34) ◽  
pp. 13957-13962 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Lewis ◽  
S. D. Bell ◽  
J. Fay ◽  
K. L. Bothi ◽  
L. Gatere ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 381-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grit Ludwig

AbstractReducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation with the help of the emerging REDD+ mechanism provides an opportunity to combine climate protection with biodiversity conservation and poverty alleviation. However, one of the crucial questions is how the rights of indigenous peoples and local communities will be protected in REDD+ implementation. This article depicts the challenges involved in protecting the rights of local communities in the case of Mozambique. The study finds that constraints regarding property and participation rights arise, in particular, from incomplete procedures of delimitation and titling, corruption, lack of rights awareness, lack of democratic structures within the community or poor infrastructure. Because many states with a REDD+ potential are not able to guarantee sufficient rights protection, the REDD+ mechanism itself needs to be endowed with strong safeguards for the rights of indigenous peoples and local communities.


2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 252-256
Author(s):  
Jonathan Storkey ◽  
John M. Holland ◽  
Ian G. Henderson ◽  
Peter J.W. Lutman ◽  
Jim Orson ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document