4002 Background: Surgery (SUR) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are both known to be effective therapy for treating patients with small oligonodular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), however there is only insufficient evidence about which therapy is more preferred approach. This randomized controlled trial was designed to prospectively compare the efficacy of SUR and RFA as the first approach to primary HCC. Methods: In this open-label trial undertaken at 49 hospital in Japan, we recruited patients having primary HCC with tumor foci numbering less than 3, each measuring 3 cm or less, Child-Pugh score of 7 or less, ages between 20 and 79 year. Before randomization, technical and liver functional feasibility for both treatment arms were confirmed by joint chart review by surgeons and hepatologists. Patients were then randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo SUR or RFA, stratified by age, infection of hepatitis-C virus, number of tumors, tumor size and institution. The primary endpoint was recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Between April 2009 and August 2015, total 308 patients were enrolled to this trial. Because of ineligibility 15 patients were excluded, therefore 145 patients underwent SUR and 148 patients underwent RFA finally. There was no perioperative mortality. Under the median follow-up of 5 years, the 3-year RFS of patients underwent SUR and RFA was 49.8%, 47.7%, respectively (hazard ration [HR] 0.96, 95% CI 0.72-1.28; p = 0.793). OS will be analyzed and published after two years. Conclusions: SUR and RFA were both safe therapeutic approaches and provided equally RFS for early stage HCC smaller than 3 cm. Clinical trial information: UMIN000001795.
Surgery Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Randomized Controlled Trial (SURF-Trial)
