Regarding “Surgical Approach and Use of Uterine Manipulator Are Not Associated with LVSI in Surgery for Early-stage Cervical Cancer: Points to be displayed”

Author(s):  
Beatriz Navarro Santana ◽  
Alicia Martin Martinez
2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 842-842
Author(s):  
Kotaro Shimura ◽  
Seiji Mabuchi

Radical trachelectomy combined with pelvic lymphadenectomy has been used to treat patients with early-stage cervical cancer who wish to preserve their fertility. Vaginal, abdominal, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches have been employed during this procedure, but all cause peritoneal damage, which could result in periadnexal adhesion. As periadnexal adhesion can lead to female infertility due to restricted sweeping of the fimbria over the ovary, it is important to minimize peritoneal damage during the fertility-preserving surgery. Aiming to minimize peritoneal damage, we recently developed a new surgical approach. The techniques used are similar to those used for type III radical hysterectomy; however, all procedures are performed via the extraperitoneal approach.In this video article, we describe a step-by-step technique of this new fertility-preserving surgical procedure. Surgical procedures are as follows: (1) extraperitoneal pelvic lymphadenectomy, (2) excision of the vesicohypogastric fascia and median umbilical ligament, (3) bladder dissection from the peritoneum and identification of uterine cervix, (4) transection of the cardinal ligaments and vesicouterine ligaments, (5) transection of the vagina, (6) excision of the rectovaginal and uterosacral ligaments, (7) transection of the uterine cervix, (8) cervical cerclage and placement of a Foley catheter, (9) anastomosis of the uterine cervix, (10) suture of the median umbilical ligament and vesicohypogastric fascia. During these procedures, the uterine arteries, inferior hypogastric nerve, and pelvic splanchnic nerve were preserved. The advantages of this new surgical approach are first, peritoneal injuries can be completely avoided as the procedure is performed extraperitoneally, and second, it can be carried out using conventional low-cost instruments. In view of these features, we consider that this technique could be an ideal treatment option for selected women with early-stage cervical cancer. The oncological and reproductive outcomes of this new surgical approach need to be evaluated in future clinical studies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Armbrust ◽  
Frank Chen ◽  
Rolf Richter ◽  
Mustafa Zela Muallem ◽  
Alexander Mustea ◽  
...  

AbstractMinimally invasive surgery (MIS) has become the standard approach in early stage cervical cancer (ECC). However, the recently published “LACC” trial and even others could show inferior PFS and OS of MIS compared to open radical hysterectomy. The results led to a widespread debate about the best surgical approach in ECC. The present survey aimed to get first insights after publication. NOGGO and AGE conducted a nationwide digital survey among 186 Gynecological Cancer Centers. Descriptive statistics and t-tests were performed using SPSS. A majority of the centers were of high expertise and/or experience in treatment of ECC and were highly aware of the LACC trial results. Trial quality and scientific value were rated as very good/good. However, still 40% would not change the standard of care to open surgery. Centers with higher volume and participating in clinical trials were more likely to change. This survey represents insights after the surprising results of recently published trials towards the surgical approach of ECC. There still seems to be a high need of future trials and possible explanations for the unexpected worse outcomes in the MIS group.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document