scholarly journals Intrarater and Inter-rater Reliability of Active Cervical Range of Motion in Patients With Nonspecific Neck Pain Measured With Technological and Common Use Devices: A Systematic Review With Meta-regression

2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (8) ◽  
pp. 597-608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angie Rondoni ◽  
Giacomo Rossettini ◽  
Diego Ristori ◽  
Fabio Gallo ◽  
Marco Strobe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Neck Pain ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Rater Reliability ◽  
Cervical Range Of Motion ◽  
Meta Regression

To What Degree Does Active Cervical Range of Motion Differ Between Patients With Neck Pain, Patients With Whiplash, and Those Without Neck Pain? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 98 (7) ◽  
pp. 1407-1434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martijn S. Stenneberg ◽  
Michiel Rood ◽  
Rob de Bie ◽  
Maarten A. Schmitt ◽  
Erik Cattrysse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Neck Pain ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cervical Range Of Motion ◽  
Pain Patients

Effectiveness of Neural Mobilisation Techniques in the Management of Musculoskeletal Neck Disorders with Nerve-Related Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with a Mapping Report

Pain Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clovis Varangot-Reille ◽  
Ferran Cuenca-Martínez ◽  
Alberto Arribas-Romano ◽  
Rodrigo Bertoletti-Rodríguez ◽  
Álvaro Gutiérrez-Martín ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Neck Pain ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cervical Range Of Motion ◽  
Arm Pain ◽  
Neck Disorders ◽  
Mean Differences ◽  
And Function

Abstract Objective The objective was to assess the effectiveness of neural mobilisation (NM) techniques in the management of musculoskeletal neck disorders with nerve-related symptoms (MND-NRS). Methods We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis, using pain intensity, disability, perceived function, cervical range of motion and mechanosensitivity as the main outcome measures. Results The systematic review included 22 studies (n = 978). More favourable outcomes were observed for NM on pain intensity compared with control interventions (standardised mean differences (SMDs) −0.92; 95% CI − 1.66-−0.18), but not compared with other treatments (OTs) (SMD 1.06; 95% CI − 0.02-2.15). Regarding neck pain intensity, no significant differences were found in favour of NM compared with OTs (SMD 0.37; 95% CI − 0.35-1.1). However, between-treatment differences were found in favour of OT on arm-pain intensity (SMD 0.57; 95% CI 0.08-1.05). In addition, the grouped MA did not show statistically significant differences between NM and OT outcomes on the cervical range of motion (SMD 0.16; 95% CI − 0.06-0.38). However, compared with no intervention, NM was associated with significantly improved outcomes in cervical rotation (SMD 0.91; 95% CI 0.61-1.22). Similar results were found regarding disability (SMD −0.08; 95% CI − 0.36-−0.20, and SMD −1.44; 95% CI − 2.28-−0.6, respectively). Finally, NM was associated with more favourable outcomes on mechanosensitivity compared with OT (SMD 0.79; 95% CI 0.15-1.42) and greater improvements in function compared with no intervention (SMD 0.89; 95% CI 0.16-1.62). Conclusions NM appeared to be effective to improve overall pain intensity when embedded in a physiotherapy treatment in the management of MND-NRS. When compared with no intervention, it was effective to improve neck rotation, disability, and function. However, it was not superior to other types of treatments in improving overall pain intensity, neck pain intensity, arm pain intensity, cervical range of motion and disability, except for mechanosensitivity.

Immediate effects of thoracic manipulation on cervical joint position sense in individuals with mechanical neck pain: A randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Emin Ulas Erdem ◽  
Banu Ünver ◽  
Eda Akbas ◽  
Gizem Irem Kinikli
Keyword(s):  
Neck Pain ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Position Sense ◽  
Joint Position Sense ◽  
Position Error ◽  
Cervical Region ◽  
Joint Position ◽  
Cervical Range Of Motion ◽  
Arm Pain ◽  
Neck Function

BACKGROUND: Performing thoracic manipulations for neck pain can result in immediate improvements in neck function. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the immediate effects of thoracic manipulation on cervical joint position sense and cervical range of motion in individuals with chronic mechanical neck pain. METHODS: Eighty male volunteers between 18–25 years and having chronic or recurrent neck or shoulder pain of at least 3 months duration with or without arm pain were randomized into two groups: Thoracic Manipulation Group (TMG:50) and Control Group (CG:30), with a pretest-posttest experimental design. The TMG was treated with thoracic extension manipulation while the CG received no intervention. Cervical joint position error and cervical range of motion of the individuals were assessed at baseline and 5 minutes later. RESULTS: There was no difference in demographic variables such as age (p= 0.764), Body Mass Index (p= 0.917) and Neck Pain Disability Scale (NPDS) scores (p= 0.436) at baseline outcomes between TMG and CGs. Joint position error outcomes between the two groups following intervention were similar in all directions at 30 and 50 degrees. Differences in range of motion following intervention in neck flexion (p< 0.001) and right rotation (p= 0.004) were higher in TMG compared to CG. CONCLUSIONS: A single session of thoracic manipulation seems to be inefficient on joint position sense in individuals with mild mechanical neck pain. However, thoracic manipulation might be an effective option to increase flexion and rotation of the cervical region as an adjunctive to treatment.

scholarly journals Short-Term Changes in Neck Pain, Widespread Pressure Pain Sensitivity, and Cervical Range of Motion After the Application of Trigger Point Dry Needling in Patients With Acute Mechanical Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

2014 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 252-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
María J. Mejuto-Vázquez ◽  
Jaime Salom-Moreno ◽  
Ricardo Ortega-Santiago ◽  
Sebastián Truyols-Domínguez ◽  
César Fernández-de-las-Peñas
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Neck Pain ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Pain Sensitivity ◽  
Trigger Point ◽  
Dry Needling ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Pressure Pain ◽  
Cervical Range Of Motion

Measuring cervical range of motion with gyroscope/accelerometer eyeglasses (JINS MEME) in persons with and without neck pain

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0
Author(s):  
Saitoh Kimio ◽  
KarinaDel Rosario ◽  
Nagao Masato ◽  
Lisa Pascual ◽  
Saam Morshed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neck Pain ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Cervical Range Of Motion

scholarly journals Modified expansive open-door laminoplasty technique improved postoperative neck pain and cervical range of motion

2015 ◽  
Vol 114 (12) ◽  
pp. 1225-1232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kuang-Ting Yeh ◽  
Ing-Ho Chen ◽  
Tzai-Chiu Yu ◽  
Kuan-Lin Liu ◽  
Cheng-Huan Peng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neck Pain ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Open Door ◽  
Cervical Range Of Motion

Comparison Between Neck Pain Disability and Cervical Range of Motion in Patients With Episodic and Chronic Migraine: A Cross-Sectional Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (9) ◽  
pp. 641-646 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriela F. Carvalho ◽  
Thais C. Chaves ◽  
Maria C. Gonçalves ◽  
Lidiane L. Florencio ◽  
Carolina A. Braz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neck Pain ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Chronic Migraine ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Cervical Range Of Motion ◽  
Pain Disability

The influence of age, gender, lifestyle factors and sub-clinical neck pain on the cervical flexion–rotation test and cervical range of motion

2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 552-559 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenric Smith ◽  
Toby Hall ◽  
Kim Robinson
Keyword(s):  
Neck Pain ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Lifestyle Factors ◽  
Cervical Range Of Motion ◽  
Rotation Test
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document