Application of heart rate variability during blood pressure measurement in patients with somatic symptom disorder

2020 ◽  
Vol 74 ◽  
pp. 25-31
Author(s):  
Wei-Lieh Huang ◽  
Horng-Huei Liou ◽  
Hsing Ouyang ◽  
Shih-Cheng Liao
2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Attila Frigy ◽  
Annamária Magdás ◽  
Victor-Dan Moga ◽  
Ioana Georgiana Coteț ◽  
Miklós Kozlovszky ◽  
...  

Objective.The possible effect of blood pressure measurements per se on heart rate variability (HRV) was studied in the setting of concomitant ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and Holter ECG monitoring (HM).Methods.In 25 hypertensive patients (14 women and 11 men, mean age: 58.1 years), 24-hour combined ABPM and HM were performed. For every blood pressure measurement, 2-minute ECG segments (before, during, and after measurement) were analyzed to obtain time domain parameters of HRV: SDNN and rMSSD. Mean of normal RR intervals (MNN), SDNN/MNN, and rMSSD/MNN were calculated, too. Parameter variations related to blood pressure measurements were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons.Results.2281 measurements (1518 during the day and 763 during the night) were included in the analysis. Both SDNN and SDNN/MNN had a constant (the same for 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime values) and significant change related to blood pressure measurements: an increase during measurements and a decrease after them (p<0.01for any variation).Conclusion.In the setting of combined ABPM and HM, the blood pressure measurement itself produces an increase in short-term heart rate variability. Clarifying the physiological basis and the possible clinical value of this phenomenon needs further studies.


2017 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-Lieh Huang ◽  
Shih-Cheng Liao ◽  
Cheryl C.H. Yang ◽  
Terry B.J. Kuo ◽  
Tzu-Ting Chen ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Guido Grassi ◽  
Fosca Quarti-Trevano, ◽  
Gino Seravalle ◽  
Raffaella Dell’Oro ◽  
Jennifer Vanoli ◽  
...  

Whether blood pressure (BP) values differ when BP is measured with or without the presence of a doctor (attended and unattended BP measurements) is controversial, and no information exists on whether and to what extent neurogenic mechanisms participate at the possible BP differences between these measurements. In this study, we assessed continuous beat-to-beat finger systolic BP and diastolic BP, heart rate, muscle, and skin sympathetic nerve traffic (microneurography) before and during BP measurement by an automatic device in the presence or absence of a doctor. This was done in 18 untreated mild-to-moderate essential hypertensive patients (age, 40.2±2.8 years, mean±SEM). During attended BP measurement, there was an increase in systolic BP, diastolic BP, heart rate, and skin sympathetic nerve traffic and a muscle sympathetic nerve traffic decrease, the peak changes being +5.3%,+8.4%,+9.4%,+30.9%, and −15.2%, respectively ( P <0.05 for all). In contrast, during unattended BP measurement, systolic BP, diastolic BP, heart rate, and skin sympathetic nerve traffic were modestly, albeit in most instances significantly, reduced, whereas muscle sympathetic nerve traffic remained almost unchanged. During unattended BP measurement, peak systolic BP was 14.1 mm Hg lower, peak heart rate was 10.6 bpm lower, and peak skin sympathetic nerve traffic was 8.5 bursts/min lower than the peak values detected during attended BP measurement. Thus the cardiovascular and neural sympathetic responses to the alerting reaction elicited by BP measurement in the presence of a doctor are almost absent during unattended BP measurement, during which, if anything, a modest cardiovascular sympathoinhibition occurs. This has important implications for comparison of studies using these different BP measurement approaches as well as for decision concerning threshold and target BP values for treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document