Hypertension Research
Latest Publications


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

4345
(FIVE YEARS 660)

H-INDEX

83
(FIVE YEARS 10)

Published By Springer Nature

1348-4214, 0916-9636

Author(s):  
Mizuki Ohashi ◽  
Katsuyuki Miura ◽  
Naoyuki Takashima ◽  
Aya Kadota ◽  
Yoshino Saito ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Biggie Baffour-Awuah ◽  
Melissa J. Pearson ◽  
Neil A. Smart ◽  
Gudrun Dieberg

AbstractUncontrolled hypertension remains the major risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Isometric resistance training (IRT) has been shown to be a useful nonpharmacological therapy for reducing blood pressure (BP); however, some exercise physiologists and other health professionals are uncertain of the efficacy and safety of IRT. Experts’ consensus was sought in light of the current variability of IRT use as an adjunct treatment for hypertension. An expert consensus-building analysis (Delphi study) was conducted on items relevant to the safety, efficacy and delivery of IRT. The study consisted of 3 phases: (1) identification of items and expert participants for inclusion; (2) a two-round modified Delphi exercise involving expert panelists to build consensus; and (3) a study team consensus meeting for a final item review. A list of 50 items was generated, and 42 international experts were invited to join the Delphi panel. Thirteen and 10 experts completed Delphi Rounds 1 and 2, respectively, reaching consensus on 26 items in Round 1 and 10 items in Round 2. The study team consensus meeting conducted a final item review and considered the remaining 14 items for the content list. A final list of 43 items regarding IRT reached expert consensus: 7/10 items on safety, 11/11 items on efficacy, 10/12 items on programming, 8/10 items on delivery, and 7/7 on the mechanism of action. This study highlights that while experts reached a consensus that IRT is efficacious as an antihypertensive therapy, some still have safety concerns, and there is also ongoing conjecture regarding optimal delivery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document