Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Versus Closed Treatment and Mandibulomaxillary Fixation of Fractures of the Mandibular Condylar Process: A Randomized, Prospective, Multicenter Study With Special Evaluation of Fracture Level

2008 ◽  
Vol 66 (12) ◽  
pp. 2537-2544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Schneider ◽  
Francois Erasmus ◽  
Klaus Louis Gerlach ◽  
Eberhard Kuhlisch ◽  
Richard A. Loukota ◽  
...  
2000 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masayuki FUKUDA ◽  
Tetsu TAKAHASHI ◽  
Katsuyuki FUNAKI ◽  
Takayoshi OHNUKI ◽  
Hiroshi TAKANO ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 384-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Horst Kokemueller ◽  
Vitomir S. Konstantinovic ◽  
Enno-Ludwig Barth ◽  
Sabine Goldhahn ◽  
Constantin von See ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 104
Author(s):  
Manisha Marathe-Pagar ◽  
C. R. Nampurkar ◽  
D. K. Sonawane ◽  
Rachana Chindhade

<p><strong>Introduction:</strong> Mandibular low subcodylar fractures have a high incidence but not much is given in literature regarding the best method of treatment. This paper describes a surgical management of a low subcondylar /ramus fracture in a 30 year old male patient.</p><p><strong>Method:</strong> Access to the fracture line was taken via Risdon’s approach that gave the good visualization of fracture line and facilitated better reduction and fixation. Plating was done on the lateral cortex of the ramus of mandible. There was a risk of damaging the marginal mandibular nerve and trauma to facial artery.</p><p><strong>Result:</strong> Resulted into good anatomical reduction and better functional rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) can create better function for the temporomandibular joint, compared with closed treatment in low subcondylar/ramus fracture surgery.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document