Comparison of Donor-Site Engraftment After Harvesting Vascularized and Nonvascularized Iliac Bone Grafts

2009 ◽  
Vol 67 (8) ◽  
pp. 1589-1594 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alireza Ghassemi ◽  
Mehrangiz Ghassemi ◽  
Dieter Riediger ◽  
Ralf-Dieter Hilgers ◽  
Marcus Gerressen
Keyword(s):  
2005 ◽  
Vol 116 (4) ◽  
pp. 1068-1075 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Elshahat ◽  
Nozumu Inoue ◽  
Guy Marti ◽  
Ikram Safe ◽  
Paul Manson ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeo Tanishima ◽  
Norio Yoshimasu ◽  
Masahiro Ogai

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuang Xu ◽  
Yueming Song ◽  
Qing Wang ◽  
Gaoju Wang ◽  
Jin Yang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the clinical outcomes of anterior surgical management for cervical spinal tuberculosis by iliac bone grafts versus structural manubrium graft.Methods From January 2009 to September 2018, 23 patients with cervical spinal tuberculosis were treated with anterior debridement,autogenous structural bone graft and fixation at our spinal department. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the different graft material,including iliac crest bone grafts in group A, structural manubrium grafts in group B. The clinical and radiographic results for the 2 groups were analyzed and compared. Results The mean duration of follow-up was 24 months. Bony fusion was achieved in all cases without failure of internal fixation. There were no significant differences between groups regarding the the operation time,blood loss,fusion time,neurological outcomes,and postoperative local Cobb angle (P>.05).However,the donor site complication rate of Group A was more than that of Group B. Postoperative ambulation time in group A was later than that of group B.The mean visual analog scale (VAS) for donor-site pain in group A was higher than group B at a week after surgery (P < 0.05).However,there was no significant difference between the 2 groups at last visit (P>.05).Conclusion Both iliac bone grafts and sternal manubrium grafts can effectively reconstruct anterior column defects in anterior surgery. However,structural sternal manubrium autografts has less complications associated with donor site morbidities than that of iliac bone.


2001 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 295-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.-R. Werther ◽  
K. Guelmi ◽  
F. Mazodier ◽  
L. Doursounian

1994 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toyohiko Isu ◽  
Kyosuke Kamada ◽  
Nobuaki Kobayashi ◽  
Shoji Mabuchi

✓ The authors describe the surgical technique of anterior cervical fusion using bone grafts obtained from cervical vertebral bodies. This series consisted of 90 patients with cervical intervertebral disc disease suffering from cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Thirty-five patients were operated on at one level, 33 at two levels, and 22 at three levels. Postoperative x-ray films showed solid bone fusion in all patients at a mean follow-up time of 24 months (range 1 year to 3 years 6 months). Anterior angulation was found in four (4.4%) of the 90 patients. This surgical procedure has two major advantages: 1) there are no complications related to the iliac donor site, allowing early patient mobilization; and 2) the extensive posterior spur can be removed safely and easily under a wide operative field without damaging the spinal cord and nerve roots.


1998 ◽  
Vol 88 (2) ◽  
pp. 255-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul D. Sawin ◽  
Vincent C. Traynelis ◽  
Arnold H. Menezes

Object. Autogeneic bone graft is often incorporated into posterior cervical stabilization constructs as a fusion substrate. Iliac crest is used frequently, although donor-site morbidity can be substantial. Rib is used rarely, despite its accessibility, expandability, unique curvature, and high bone morphogenetic protein content. The authors present a comparative analysis of autogeneic rib and iliac crest bone grafts, with emphasis on fusion rate and donor-site morbidity. Methods. A review was conducted of records and radiographs from 600 patients who underwent cervical spinal fusion procedures in which autogeneic bone grafts were used. Three hundred patients underwent rib harvest and posterior cervical fusion. The remaining 300 patients underwent iliac crest harvest (248 for an anterior cervical fusion and 52 for posterior fusion). The analysis of fusion focused on the latter subgroup; donor-site morbidity was determined by evaluating the entire group. Fusion criteria included bony trabeculae traversing the donor—recipient interface and long-term stability on flexion—extension radiographs. Graft morbidity was defined as any untoward event attributable to the graft harvest. Statistical comparisons were facilitated by using Fisher's exact test. Conclusions. Demographic data obtained in both groups were comparable. Rib constructs were placed in the following regions: occipitocervical (196 patients), atlantoaxial (35 patients), and subaxial cervical spine (69 patients). Iliac crest grafts were placed in the occipitocervical (28 patients), atlantoaxial (10 patients), and subaxial cervical (14 patients) regions. Fusion occurred in 296 (98.8%) of 300 rib graft and 49 (94.2%) of 52 iliac crest graft constructs (p = 0.056). Graft morbidity was greater with iliac crest than with rib (p < 0.00001). Donor-site morbidity for the rib graft was 3.7% and included pneumonia (eight patients), persistent atelectasis (two patients), and superficial wound dehiscence (one patient). Pneumothorax, intercostal neuralgia, and chronic chest wall pain were not encountered. Iliac crest morbidity occurred in 25.3% of the patients and consisted of chronic donor-site pain (52 patients), wound dehiscence (eight patients), pneumonia (seven patients), meralgia paresthetica (four patients), hematoma requiring evacuation (three patients), and iliac spine fracture (two patients). Even when chronic pain was not considered, morbidity encountered in obtaining iliac crest still exceeded that encountered with rib harvest (p = 0.035). The fusion rate and donor-site morbidity for rib autograft compare favorably with those for iliac crest when used in posterior cervical constructs. To the authors' knowledge, this represents the largest series to date in which the safety and efficacy of using autogeneic bone graft materials in spinal surgery are critically analyzed.


1983 ◽  
Vol 65 (7) ◽  
pp. 1023-1025 ◽  
Author(s):  
S P Cowley ◽  
L D Anderson
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document